Definition of Right of First Refusal

What is a Right of First Refusal?

By the AllBusiness.com Team

The Right of First Refusal (ROFR) is a contractual agreement that gives a party—often an investor or company—the first opportunity to purchase an asset before the owner can sell it to someone else. In the context of startups, this typically applies to equity ownership or shares in the company. If a founder or early employee decides to sell their shares, those subject to ROFR must offer them first to the company or designated investors on the same terms offered by a third party.

For startups, the inclusion of a ROFR clause can significantly affect the control and future of the company. It protects the company from losing equity to unwanted external parties and helps maintain a stable cap table. Especially in early-stage ventures, where founders, co-founders, and investors have to align closely, ROFR can be a key instrument in governance and decision-making continuity.

1. How ROFR Works in Startup Equity Agreements

Right of First Refusal clauses most frequently appear in shareholder agreements, investor term sheets, and employee stock option plans. When someone holding company shares decides to sell, they must first offer them to the party holding the ROFR—usually the company itself, the founders, or existing investors.

Here’s how a typical ROFR process works in startups:

1. The shareholder receives a bona fide offer from a third party.
2. They must notify the ROFR holder, usually in writing, detailing the price and terms.
3. The ROFR holder typically has a fixed time period (e.g., 30 days) to decide whether to match the offer.
4. If the ROFR holder declines, the shareholder may then proceed with the sale to the third party under the same terms.

This process ensures that existing stakeholders can maintain ownership stability and limit dilution or influence from external sources.

2. ROFR vs. Other Contractual Rights

It’s important for startups and founders to distinguish ROFR from similar-sounding terms, especially Right of First Offer (ROFO) and Tag-Along Rights.

• Right of First Offer (ROFO): This right requires the selling shareholder to offer their shares to the ROFO holder before seeking third-party buyers. It can be less restrictive but also offers less market transparency.
  
• Tag-Along Rights: These rights protect minority shareholders by allowing them to sell their shares alongside majority shareholders if a sale is being negotiated.

Compared to ROFO, ROFR is often seen as more favorable to the right-holder because it lets them match offers after a market valuation is established. In startup environments where equity stakes are closely guarded, ROFR ensures stronger control over who ends up on the cap table.

3. Strategic Use of ROFR by Venture Capitalists

Venture capital firms often negotiate for ROFR clauses as part of their term sheets. This is especially common in Series A or B rounds when startups are still private and equity is highly sensitive.

For VCs, ROFR serves two key purposes:

• It helps maintain or increase ownership percentage over time without immediate additional capital investment.
• It blocks rival firms or strategic competitors from gaining a foothold in the startup.

Startups, in turn, may offer ROFR as a concession in negotiations without affecting the company’s current valuation, which can help secure early funding without relinquishing too much control.

However, it's worth noting that ROFR can sometimes deter new investors. If the ROFR is too broad or tightly enforced, it can create friction in future funding rounds by complicating the transfer of shares.

Sign up for our free weekly AllBusiness.com newsletter HERE.

4. ROFR in Employee Stock and Secondary Sales

Startups often use ROFR to manage employee stock options and secondary sales. As companies grow and employees seek liquidity before an IPO or acquisition, secondary sales become more common. ROFR allows the company or its investors to buy these shares instead of having them end up in unknown hands.

For instance, companies like Stripe and SpaceX have used secondary markets to provide liquidity to employees while keeping a tight grip on the shareholder base. ROFR provisions give companies a way to balance employee incentives with long-term capitalization control.

This also plays into startup valuation. The ability to control who holds shares, and how many shares circulate outside of core stakeholders, keeps internal operations and strategy confidential, especially before a public offering or acquisition.

5. Legal and Operational Considerations for Startups

While ROFR is a valuable tool, startups need to implement it carefully. Poorly drafted ROFR clauses can lead to delays, legal disputes, and missed business opportunities.

Key considerations when drafting or reviewing ROFR clauses:

• Scope: Define clearly which shares or classes of shares are subject to ROFR.
• Trigger Events: Specify what types of transactions (e.g., sale, transfer, gift) activate the ROFR.
• Notification Process: Outline the format and timeline for notifying ROFR holders.
• Response Timeline: Set a clear deadline (e.g., 15–45 days) for ROFR holders to act.
• Transfer Terms: Ensure third-party sales occur under identical terms to avoid disputes.

Engaging experienced startup attorneys is essential to crafting enforceable ROFR clauses that align with the company’s growth goals and investor relations.

Summary of Right of First Refusal

The Right of First Refusal is a powerful yet nuanced tool in the startup world. It provides companies and investors with a mechanism to maintain ownership control, manage dilution, and ensure strategic alignment. While beneficial, ROFR must be clearly drafted and applied thoughtfully to avoid stifling growth or deterring new capital.

Here are some key takeaways for startup founders and stakeholders:

• ROFR allows existing shareholders or the company to match third-party offers for equity before a sale can go through.
• It is commonly used in early-stage investment rounds and employee equity programs.
• ROFR helps maintain a stable and aligned cap table by preventing unwanted ownership changes.
• Poorly designed ROFR clauses can delay transactions or hinder fundraising.
  Legal guidance is critical to ensure enforceability and fairness in implementation.