Liquidation Preference

What is Liquidation Preference?

Liquidation preference is a critical term in venture capital and startup financing that determines the order and amount in which different investors get paid when a company is sold, merged, or goes through bankruptcy. It essentially provides certain investors—typically those holding preferred shares—with the right to receive their money back before other shareholders (like common stockholders) in the event of a "liquidation event." This protection mechanism ensures that investors can minimize their downside risk while still maintaining their upside potential.

The term might sound technical, but understanding liquidation preference is fundamental for both founders and investors. For founders, it directly impacts how much money they and their team will receive if their company is acquired. For investors, it serves as a safety net that can guarantee some return on investment even if the company doesn't achieve the spectacular growth initially projected. Liquidation preferences are negotiated during financing rounds and specified in a company's term sheet and charter documents.

Types of Liquidation Preferences

Liquidation preferences come in various forms, each with different implications for both investors and founders. The most common types include:

Non-participating Liquidation Preference: Also known as "simple" preference, this gives investors the right to receive either their original investment amount back OR convert their preferred shares to common shares and share the proceeds proportionally with other common shareholders. Investors will choose whichever option maximizes their return.
Participating Liquidation Preference: Often referred to as "double-dipping," this allows investors to first receive their investment back, and then also participate in the distribution of the remaining proceeds to reduce the founders' take.
Capped Participation: This is a middle ground where investors receive their investment back and then participate in the distribution up to a predetermined multiple (e.g., 3x their original investment). Once they hit this cap, they stop receiving additional proceeds.
Multiple-based Preferences: These preferences entitle investors to receive a multiple of their original investment (e.g., 1.5x, 2x, or 3x) before common shareholders receive anything. Higher multiples obviously favor investors at the expense of founders and employees.

How Liquidation Preference Affects Startup Exits

The structure of liquidation preferences can dramatically impact the distribution of proceeds in various exit scenarios:

Scenario 1: Low Exit Value (Below Investment Amount)

When a company sells for less than the total investment raised, liquidation preferences determine who gets paid and how much. In this "downside protection" scenario:

Investors with liquidation preference will recover some or all of their investment
Common shareholders (founders and employees) might receive nothing
The preference order becomes crucial, as senior preferred stock holders get paid before junior ones

Scenario 2: Moderate Exit Value

In mid-range exits where the company sells for more than the investment amount but less than a home-run valuation:

Investors will typically choose to take their liquidation preference if it yields more than converting to common stock
The specific preference structure can make an enormous difference in founders' proceeds
Participating preferences can significantly reduce founder returns compared to non-participating ones

Sign up for our free weekly AllBusiness.com newsletter HERE.

Scenario 3: High-Value Exit

In successful exits with substantial returns:

Investors with non-participating preferences will typically convert to common shares to maximize returns
The impact of liquidation preferences diminishes as the exit value increases substantially above the preference amount
However, participating preferences can still extract significant value even in highly successful exits

Negotiating Liquidation Preferences

Liquidation preferences are crucial terms to negotiate during fundraising. Here are key considerations for both sides:

For Founders:

Push for 1x non-participating liquidation preference (the most founder-friendly option)
Resist multiple-based preferences (2x, 3x) as they drastically increase the exit value needed for founders to see returns
Consider the cumulative effect of preferences across multiple rounds
Watch out for "pay-to-play" provisions that might modify liquidation preferences
Remember that liquidation preferences are often more negotiable than valuation

For Investors:

Consider reasonable downside protection that aligns incentives without overly penalizing founders
Evaluate whether stronger preferences are truly necessary based on the risk profile of the investment
Understand how your preferences might affect the company's ability to raise future rounds and the terms of those rounds
Consider how preferences might impact founder motivation if exit scenarios leave them with little upside

Companies like Uber and Airbnb had relatively standard 1x non-participating preferences in their early rounds, which helped maintain founder alignment through their growth phases. Conversely, some companies that raised during difficult market conditions, like Foursquare in its later rounds, faced more investor-friendly terms.

Historical Trends in Liquidation Preferences

Liquidation preference terms have evolved with market conditions and reflect the balance of power between founders and investors:

During the Dot-com Era (1995-2001): Aggressive terms with participating preferences and high multiples were common
Post-2008 Financial Crisis: Investor-friendly terms reemerged as capital became scarce
2013-2021 Bull Market: Founder-friendly 1x non-participating preferences became standard as capital was abundant
Post-2022 Market Correction: More investor-protective terms have returned, though not to the extremes of earlier eras

The National Venture Capital Association reported that during the 2016-2020 period, approximately 80% of venture deals included 1x non-participating preferences. However, following the 2022 market correction and funding contraction, terms have shifted moderately toward investors, with more deals including participating features or higher multiples.

Summary of Liquidation Preference

Liquidation preference stands as one of the most consequential economic terms in venture financing, creating a safety net for investors while potentially limiting returns for founders and employees. The specific structure—whether non-participating or participating, 1x or multiple—can dramatically impact the distribution of proceeds across different exit scenarios. For founders, understanding these provisions is crucial, as they effectively establish the threshold that must be crossed before common shareholders begin to see meaningful returns from an exit.

For the startup ecosystem as a whole, liquidation preferences represent a balancing mechanism between risk and reward. While these terms provide essential downside protection for those supplying capital, overly aggressive preferences can misalign incentives and potentially hamper a company's ability to attract talent and subsequent funding. As with many aspects of venture financing, the most sustainable approach often involves terms that protect investor capital while maintaining appropriate founder incentives—ensuring that all stakeholders remain focused on building substantial long-term value rather than engineering particular exit scenarios.

Definition of Liquidation Preference