I was trying to figure out what to do for lunch, the lecture had free food… Actually, the topic seemed interesting, and I figured that the experience could be insightful in some unexpected ways. For instance, the professor who presented his findings was in the finance department, so I hoped to learn a little more about the department's approach to applied academics. It turned out that the audience was largely composed of faculty members, who discussed a lot during the presentation.
It seems like some students are especially annoyed by having to study the exact details of marketing. Ultimately, attention to detail has been the main complaint about the Intro. Marketing mid-term, which was expected to be more difficult than "it should be". Now, as a liberal arts person, this attitude irks me... I could go on for a long time about how "soft skills" are scoffed at in the Silicon Valley.
A few of the readings clearly detailed expected sets of behavior for professional teams and their individual members. Obviously, the formation of study groups encouraged the practice of analyzing our own behavior. That was a little awkward at times, like trying to spot the "sucker" at a poker table in the hopes that it's not you.
The tailgate party was a great spread, and went strong for at least half an hour after the opening pitch. With the famously high cost of stadium consumables, the free food and alcohol provided by the NAC organizers was awfully appealing. It was also the sort of mingling opportunity that was, of course, the main point of the event.
My background is well suited to the management and marketing classes I'll be attending. I'm also looking forward to seeing classmates from previous quarters, and I expect to be working more closely with other students as we do our first group projects. I like collaboration, which is lucky, since group projects seem to be a core aspect of MBA education.
It is actually a professional tool, with potential for the exchange of extremely valuable information. Job opportunities aside, a professional network's value can be judged by the volume and reliability of information within the network. I like to know that if I asked my LinkedIn network a question, I would get a solid professional answer.
I encourage myself: more Economist and Bloomberg news, less Valleywag and BoingBoing Gadgets. AllBusiness.com, of course, has a strong appeal for me. There is also an enormous stack of periodicals sitting right in front of me as I sit in the Graduate Business Program student lounge.
Reading the Economist, or other business publications, I may possibly come across recently learned accounting concepts. The "soft skills" that we studied in the management class can be tied to religion, politics, and anything else involving organizations. Basically, if I open a paper or wander the internets for a couple of minutes, I can find something relevant to general management concepts.