Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com
 

Can domestic partner coverage continue under COBRA?

Thursday, July 2 2009

If you offer employees the option of healthcare coverage for domestic partners you are not alone. More than 35% percent of US private employers including 52% percent of Fortune 500 companies allow their workers to choose healthcare benefits that cover domestic partners.

 

While plans have increasingly included domestic partner eligibility there is no federal requirement to offer continuation of benefits when coverage ends. COBRA legislation mandates that employers offer plan options to covered employees, their spouses and covered dependent children when a qualifying event occurs. Qualifying events include termination of employment, loss coverage due to a change in status, death of the employee and divorce.

 

Employers may choose to offer the option of continuing domestic partner benefits. Check with the benefits provider before you do, they don’t have to extend coverage that is not required by COBRA. As with any other benefit decision it’s important to be consistent. Don’t decide to extend the option to one laid off manager and not another.

 

Domestic partners are not eligible for the 65% federal subsidy included as part of this year’s economic stimulus package. The ARRA subsidy is only available to federally eligible COBRA participants, former employees their spouse and dependent children. So if you offer continuation of domestic partner benefits you will have to figure out an entirely different premium rate, or multiple rates based upon the choices made by the terminated or laid off employee.

 

Add this complication to the list of reasons to outsource COBRA administration!

 

In addition, make sure to read these articles:

Latest Comments in  posts

Thank you, Rebecca, for shedding light on how this lack of federal protection for "domestic partners" affects gay and lesbian couples in the U.S. As we are unable to have our marriages legally recognized by the federal government, we must rely on PRIVATE companies that extend benefits to domestic partners. But, as you point out, there are separate and distinct laws made and applied to two distinct and separate groups of U.S. citizens. This is the very definition of Apartheid, and it should be appalling to all U.S. citizens that we live in such a society. Read a powerful piece by David Mixner, former adviser to the Clinton White House, on this topic: http://www.davidmixner.com/2009/07/separate-but-unequal-means-gay-apartheid.html#more ...
By: diego on 7/2/09 at 2:14 PM
You must sign-in or sign-up to comment on this post.

Interactive Blogger Map
Use our interactive map to figure out where Bloggers are located

View AllBusiness Bloggers in a larger map
Franchising Expert
mleonard_80
Ask Mark Leonard, Our
Franchising Expert,
Your Question
Small Business Expert
rlesonsky_80
Ask Rieva Lesonsky, Our
Small Business Expert,
Your Question
B2B Sales Expert
jkonrath_80
Ask Jill Konrath, Our
B2B Sales Expert,
Your Question
Business Travel Expert
krosen_80
Ask Ken Walker, Our
Business Travel Expert,
Your Question
Finance Expert
sthacker_80
Ask Sam Thacker, Our
Finance Expert,
Your Question
Invention Expert
Ask Stephen Key, Our
Expert on Licensing Your
Invention, a Question