Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com

Corps/Corpse: The U.S. Military and Homosexuality

By Brouwer, Daniel C
Publication: Western Journal of Communication
Date: Friday, October 1 2004
HEADNOTE

I examine testimony of over thirty military witnesses during four days of 1993 congressional hearings addressing the controversy over gays and lesbians serving openly in the United States military. Witnesses dispute two major

topics: the "nature" of the military, and the "nature" of homosexuals. These topics parallel dual meanings of "corps" that structure this controversy-corps as a social body and corps as the flesh of physical bodies. More broadly, I argue that the rhetorical strategies of incorporation and disincorporation function as indices of power, for these strategies are unequally available to the disputants and engender disparate rhetorical effects.

IN 1992, U.S. presidential candidate William Jefferson Clinton proposed lifting the ban against gays and lesbians openly serving in the United States military, and during the next several months, he was dialectically enjoined by military representatives, members of Congress, political activists, pundits, and many others. A compromise policy, the notorious "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," emerged, was approved by Congress, and signed by President Clinton in November 1993 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994. Rather than abating political controversy, however, the policy catalyzed bouts of debate over the qualities of the U.S. military and the characteristics of gays and lesbians. Discharged gay and lesbian soldiers have challenged the policy in courts as their numbers increased each year between 1996 and 2001, a trend only recently reversed in 2002 ("Military Discharged," 2003). Furthermore, news reports tell of six student linguists, gay soldiers training as Arabic translators, who were dismissed from the military just months after Bush Administration and military officials' post-September 11 lamentations that there were too few Arabic translators in the military.1

In addition, make sure to read these articles: