This essay explores rhetorical contextualization, or how rhetoric both reveals and conceals subjects in the socio-cultural terrain. Utilizing Burke's notion of representative anecdotes, equipment for living, and frames of acceptance/rejection/transition,
Keywords: Kenneth Burke, representative anecdote, equipment for living, attitude, trope.
THE WORK OF Kenneth Burke marks the intellectual crossroads of the history of American rhetorical theory. Burke's ideas at once nudged the neo-Aristotelian notion of "context" into the broader term of "scene," and provided an avenue for the development of the more culturally-oriented rhetorical theories that currently permeate the field. In addition to his dramatistic pentad, Burke's discussions of tropes (Moore, 1996), frames (Brummett, 1984a; Carlson, 1988), and representative anecdotes (Brummett, 1984b) have inspired scholarship that illustrated how the symbols we use are at once a reflection, selection, and deflection of socio-cultural realities (Burke, 1945). Contemporary scholars have recently turned this idea back on Burke, though, to illustrate how the symbols he used reveals-among other perspectives-his tendency to describe human symbolic activity in universal terms, an approach that obscures the diversity of rhetorical activity (e.g., Chesebro, 1992; Condit, 1992; Murray, 1998). The question of Burke's relevance to contemporary rhetorical scholarship has produced a number of scholarly efforts that attempt to refine them and/or connect them to more "cutting-edge" developments in rhetorical theory (e.g., Brock, 1995; Chesebro, 1993).