Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com

She shoots, she scores: Mediated constructions of contemporary female athletes in coverage of...

HEADNOTE

The contemporary mediascape is populated as never before by scores of female athletes and women's sports teams. Because the mainstream media are notorious for their perpetuation of traditional gender roles, this raises interesting

questions regarding how these women are represented in the media. In this essay, I assess the media coverage of the 1999 US women's soccer team; I argue that these athletes are gendered by the media via sexualizing strategies that are subtler and more sophisticated than those of years past. Accordingly, despite apparent progress represented by increasing numbers of female athletes, the hegemonic function of media coverage of them is even more profound today than it has been historically.

TRADITIONAL gender constructs long have been a staple of the mass media, which in turn are a primary, if not the primary, means by which those constructs are reified and articulated to the public today. The pervasiveness of rigidly defined gender norms in the media has been well documented in the literature over the last two decades, especially insofar as they are applied to women. In particular, women have been and continue to be, in large part, portrayed as subservient; dependent; other-defined and -oriented; and physically and mentally deficient, explicitly or implicitly in comparison with men (see, e.g., Modleski, 1984; Radway, 1984; Tuchman, 1978). A primary feature of these mediated representations is the objectification and sexualisation of women, particularly to the extent that they are fetishised and displayed, rendered as objects of the male gaze (e.g., Mayne, 1984; Mulvey, 1989; Wolf, 1991). Moreover, many critics note that the relatively recent advent of apparently feminist sensibilities in the contemporary media in fact camouflages subtle strategies that undermine those ideas, predicating them instead on patriarchal terms (e.g., Dow, 1992; Faludi, 1991; Shugart, Waggoner, & Hallstein, 2001).

In addition, make sure to read these articles: