A new radio service targeting school bus listeners is not without detractors Public service announcements are plentiful on Bus Radio, a network that began broadcasting entertainment programs to school buses this year.
Needham, Mass.-based Bus Radio, which currently
reaches 100,000 students, expects to reach 1 million kids in 11 states by the end of the 2006-2007 school year. With the push of a button, bus drivers can air separate broadcasts for elementary, middle and high school students at no cost to the districts.
Each hourlong block, taped separately for the morning and afternoon commutes, contains 44 minutes of music, talk and interviews. The remainder is divided between national advertisers and messages about bus safety, healthy eating and other issues.
Bus Radio pays school districts according to how much they use the broadcasts and how many students ride the buses. The company won't name its advertisers or the labels whose content it has licensed. A demonstration broadcast featured songs by acts including Christina Aguilera and Gnarls Barkley. A promo by Avril Lavigne advised students to "stay in your seats, stay in school and stay tuned to Bus Radio." Lavigne's manager, Terry McBride, arranged for the promo because "any chance to be anywhere our audience hangs out is where we should be." PD Ed Moloney has also sought out unsigned acts and "artists that labels are having a tough time getting to FM radio." What Moloney is not looking for is risqué content. "If there is a parental advisory sticker [on the CD], that's a red flag for us," says Moloney, who prints out lyrics and screens songs for cursing and innuendo.
Still, Bus Radio has raised the hackles of activists who oppose commercial activity in schools.
Anna Weselak, president of the National PTA, says her organization signed a letter opposing Bus Radio because "students have no choice." Weselak, who had not heard the broadcasts when she spoke with Billboard, added that schools in need of money "can partner with businesses and organizations in their communities that do not exploit children." Alex Molnar, professor of education policy at Arizona State University and head of its Commercialism in Education Research Unit, adds to Weselak's notion.
"Advertising [to kids] is inherently manipulative in a way in which it's not manipulative to adults, who presumably have distance, judgment and so on," he says.
But unlike the child obesity epidemic, which galvanized parents to oppose junk food in schools, Molnar admits the arguments against Bus Radio "seem to some parents to be rather abstract . . . this becomes something that they don't necessarily support, but on the other hand, don't have the energy to oppose." If a district objects to a specific ad, the company says it can delete it from the local feed‹a level of control that appeals to Brian Forget, business administrator for the Triton Regional School District in northeastern Massachusetts.
Forget received a letter signed by the National PTA and dozens of advocacy groups, as well as a few complaints from parents, "that we're throwing [kids] in a metal can and forcing them to listen to advertisements." But since bus drivers often use FM radio anyway as a reward for good behavior, "they're already listening to them," Forget says.
"This allows us to control both the content and the advertisements." Holly Janvrin, a bus driver and PTA president at Salisbury Elementary in Salisbury, Mass., calls Bus Radio a "long overdue" alternative to crude shock-jock content and alcohol ads. "I find my bus singing a lot," Janvrin says, citing "Hannah Montana" as a particular favorite. "And I find they are staying in their seats more."