INTRODUCTION

Each year, the Journal provides a compilation of the most important and timely articles on computers, technology, and the law. The Bibliography, indexed by subject matter, is designed to be a research guide to assist our readers in searching for recent articles on computer and technology law. This year's annual Bibliography contains nearly 1000 articles, found through the examination of over 1000 periodicals.

The Bibliography aims to include topics on every legal aspect of computers and technology. However, as new issues in this field emerge, we welcome your suggestions for additional topics and sources, as well as your commentary on the Bibliography.

INDEX

1. Computers and Technology in Law Practice

1.0 General

Alan F. Blakley, Making the Most of Technology, FED. LAW., Aug. 2005, at 14.

Tracey L. Boyd, The Information Black Hole: Managing the Issues Arising from the Increase in Electronic Data Discovery in Litigation, 7 VAND. J. ENT. L. & PRAC. 323 (2005).

Laura DiBiase, Column: To Blog or Not to Blog? 24-9 AM. BANKR. INST. J. 32 (2005).

Michelle G. Falkow, Visual Literacy and the Design of Legal Web Sites, 97 LAW LIBR. J. 435 (2005).

Marie Stefanini Newman, Not the Evil TWEN: How Online Course Management Software Supports Non-Linear Learning in Law Schools, 5 J. HIGH TECH. L. 183 (2005).

1.1 Computerized Legal Research

1.1.0 General

Paul Hellyer, Assessing the Influence of Computer-Assisted Legal Research: A Study of California Supreme Court Opinions, 97 LAW LIBR. J. 285 (2005).

Thomas Sullivan, The Perils of Online Legal Research: A Caveat for Diligent Counsel, 29 AM. J. TRIAL ADVOC. 81 (2005).

Apolonia Valdovinos & Per Casey, RSS: What is It, and What Can It Do? 2005 SAN FRANCISCO ATT'Y 27.

1.1.1 Online Legal Research

Robert Ambrogi, IP Blogs: Pocket Parts for a Digital Age, 48 RES GESTAE 40 (2005).

Abdul Paliwala, E-Learning and Culture Change: The IOLIS Story, 39 LAW TCHR. 1 (2005).

Lee F. Peoples, The Death of the Digest and the Pitfalls of Electronic Research: What Is the Modern Legal Researcher to Do? 97 LAW LIBR. J. 661 (2005).

Stephen M. Terrell, Take Advantage of E-mail Discussion Lists 48 RES GESTAE 44 (2005).

1.1.2 Legal Research Using CD-ROM

1.2 Law Office Management

1.2.0 General

Susan Kostal, Small Firms and Technology: Representing: Your Law Firm on the Web, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO ATT'Y 19.

Laura DiBiase, Column: Electronic Discovery, 24-3 AM. BANKR. INST. J. 34 (2005).

Irma S. Russell, Introduction, 21st Century Law, Technology, and Ethics: The Lawyer's Role as a Public Citizen, 35 U. MEM. L. REV. 619 (2005).

1.2.1 Office Automation

1.2.2 Case Management

Sonia Salinas, Note, Electronic Discovery and Cost-Shifting: Who Foots the Bill? 38 LOY. L.A.L. REV. 1639 (2005).

1.2.3 Case File Security

Campbell C. Steele, Attorneys Beware: Metadata's Impact on Privilege, Work Product, and the Ethical Rules, 35 U. MEM. L. REV. 911 (2005).

Eric White, Small Firms and Technology, 2005 SAN FRANCISCO ATT'Y 26.

1.2.4 Internet Access

1.3 Selected Uses in the Law Practice

1.3.0 General

Lindy Burris Arwood, Personal Jurisdiction: Are the Federal Rules Keeping Up With (Internet) Traffic, 39 VAL. U.L. REV. 967 (2005).

Kelly A. Borchers, Mission Impossible: Applying Arcane Fourth Amendment Precedent To Advanced Cellular Phones, 40 VAL. U.L. REV. 223 (2005).

David W. Case, Corporate Environmental Reporting As Informational Regulation: A Law and Economics Perspective, 76 U. COLO. L. REV. 379, (2005).

1.3.1 Tax Filing

1.3.2 Bankruptcy

Jack Seward, Column, Back to the Future: FRCP and Electronic Discovery in Bankruptcy, 24-1 AM. BANKR. INST. J. 24 (2005).

Jack Seward, Column, Always Look Both Ways--Especially When Using Digital/Electronic Communications, 24-6 AM. BANKR. INST. J. 40 (2005).

1.3.3 Estate Planning

Jason E. Havens, More Results from the Membership Survey on Technology Use in Drafting, 19 PROBATE AND PROPERTY 57 (2005).

Chad Michael Ross, Commentary, Probate--Taylor v. Holt: The Tennessee Court of Appeals Allows a Computer Generated Signature to Validate a Testamentary Will, 35 U. MEM. L. REV. 603 (2005).

1.3.4 Real Estate

Kraettli Q. Epperson, A Status Report: On-Line Images and E-Filing of Land Documents in Oklahoma, 59 CONSUMER FIN. L.Q. PEP. 316 (2005).

1.3.5 Advertising

Michael J. Tonsing, Creating or Rethinking Your Firm's Website Presence, FED. LAW., Jul. 2005, at 10.

Cydney A. Tune, How the Internet has Changed the Landscape of Entertainment Law Ethics, ENT. & SPORTS LAW., Spring 2005, at 2.

2. Computers and Technology in Litigation

2.0 General

Warren E. Agin, I'm a Domain Name. What Am I? Making Sense of Kremen v. Cohen, 14 J. BANKR. L. & PRAC. 3 (2005).

Margaret A. Berger, Science for Judges III: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research and Forensic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 1 (2005).

Jerry Hatchett, Electronic Discovery: Beneath the Surface, 41 TENN. B.J. 25 (2005).

David K. Isom, Electronic Discovery Primer for Judges, FED. CTS. L. REV., Feb. 2005, at 1.

Steven H. Morrissett, A Perspective on Modern Discovery in U.S. Intellectual Property Litigation, 22 CAN. INTEL. PROP. REV. 53 (2005).

Lloyd S. van Oostenrijk, Comment, Paper or Plastic?: Electronic Discovery and Spoliation in the Digital Age, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 1163 (2005).

Kevin J. Powers, David Hasselhoff No Longer Owns the Only Talking Car: Automotive Black Boxes in Criminal Law, 39 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 289 (2005).

Edward S. Snyder, Cybersnooping, FAM. ADVOC., Spring 2005, at 20.

Valerie Stewart & Susan Zucker, Sharing Knowledge to Promote Justice, FED. LAW., Aug. 2005, at 28.

Yulia A. Timofeeva, Worldwide Prescriptive Jurisdiction in the Internet Content Controversies: A Comparative Analysis, 20 CONN. J. INT'L L. 199 (2005).

Maria N. Vernance, E-Mailing Service of Process: It's a Shoe-In! 36 UWLA L. REV. 274 (2005).

Michael Whiteman, Appellate Court Briefs on the Web: Electronic Dynamos or Legal Quagmire? 97 LAW LIBR. J. 467 (2005).

Adam Wolfson, "Electronic Fingerprints": Doing Away with the Conception of Computer-Generated Records as Hearsay 104 MICH. L. REV. 151 (2005).

2.1 Scientific Evidence

2.1.0 General

Symposium, Panel Three--The Role of Scientific Evidence, 80 IND. L.J. 69 (2005).

Margaret A. Berger, Science for Judges III: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research and Forensic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 1 (2005).

Michael O. Finkelstein & Bruce Levin, Compositional Analysis of Bullet Lead as Forensic Evidence, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 119 (2005).

David Michaels and Celeste Monforton, Scientific Evidence in The Regulatory System: Manufacturing Uncertainty and the Demise of the Formal Regulatory System, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 17 (2005).

Howard L. Speight & Lisa C. Kelly, Electronic Discovery, Not Your Father's Discovery, 37 ST. MARY'S L. J. 119 (2005).

2.1.1 Expert Testimony

David Korn, Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 7 (2005).

Sheldon Krimsky, The Funding Effect in Science and its Implications for the Judiciary, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 43 (2005).

Steven A. Koehler & Cyril H. Wecht, 26 J. LEGAL MED. 259 (reviewing SUHA F. DAOU & JEFFREY G. SOPER, EFFECTIVE EXPERT WITNESSING, FOURTH EDITION: PRACTICE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY JACK V. MATSON (2004)).

Howard Smith, A Model for Validating an Expert's Opinion in Medical Negligence Cases, 26 J. LEGAL MED. 207 (2005).

Michael J. Tonsing, Experts Via the Internet, FED. LAW., Dec. 2005, at 14.

2.1.2 DNA Typing

Julian Adams, Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA in the Courtroom, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 69 (2005).

Edward K. Cheng, Mitochondrial DNA: Emerging Legal Issues, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 99 (2005).

Claire S. Hulse, Dangerous Balance: The Ninth Circuit's Validation of Expansive DNA Testing Of Federal Parolees, 35 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. 31 (2005).

Garrett E. Land, Judicial Assessment or Judicial Notice? An Evaluation of the Admissibility Standards for DNA Evidence and Proposed Solutions to Repress the Current Efforts to Expand Forensic DNA Capabilities, 9 MICH. ST. J. MED. & LAW 95 (2005).

Jacqueline K.S. Lew, Note, The Next Step in DNA Databank Expansion? The Constitutionality of DNA Sampling of Former Arrestees, 57 HASTINGS L.J. 199 (2005).

Yasmin Elaine Waring, Commentary, Is DNA "'TNT" For Civil Liberties?" Defusing Ohio's Explosive New DNA Collection Law, 31 DAYTON L. REV. 105 (2005).

2.1.3 Fingerprint

Rebecca Parrott Waldren, Note, Expectations and Practical Results in Fingerprinting Technology: Where is the Line Drawn? 31 J. LEGIS. 397 (2005).

Sandy L. Zabell, Fingerprint Evidence, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 143 (2005).

2.1.4 Polygraph

2.1.5 Forensic Evidence

2.2 Demonstrative Evidence

2.2.0 General

Daniel B. Garrie & Matthew J. Armstrong, Electronic Discovery and the Challenge Posed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2005 UCLA J. L. TECH. 2 (2005).

J. Bradley Ponder, Note, But Look Over Here: How the Use of Technology at Trial Mesmerizes Jurors and Secures Verdicts, 29 LAW & PSYCHOL. REV. 289 (2005).

2.2.1 Computer-Generated Evidence

Jack Seward, 24-9 AM. BANKR. INST. J. 34 (2005) (reviewing MICHAEL R. ARKFELD, ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY AND EVIDENCE (2003)).

Shannon M. Curreri, Note, Defining "Document" in the Digital Landscape of Electronic Discovery, 38 LOY. L.A.L. REV. 1541 (2005).

Ophir D. Finkelthal, Note, Scope of Electronic Discovery and Methods of Production, 38 LOY. L.A.L. REV. 1591 (2005).

Richard K. Herrmann, Vincent J. Poppiti & David K. Sheppard, Managing Discovery in the Digital Age: A Guide to Electronic Discovery in the District of Delaware, 8 DEE. L. REV. 75 (2005).

Erin E. Kenneally, Confluence of Digital Evidence and the Law: On the Forensic Soundness of Live-Remote Digital Evidence Collection, 2005 UCLA J. L. TECH. 5 (2005).

Shaun Murphy, Prepare For E-Discovery in Four Easy Steps Identify the Who, What, Where, and When, 2005 SAN FRANSISCO ATT'Y 29 (2005).

Gordon M. Shapiro & Brian Kilpatrick, E-mail Discovery and Privilege, 30 ADVOC. Q. 258 (2005).

Tara McGraw Swaminatha, The Fourth Amendment Unplugged: Electronic Evidence Issues & Wireless Defenses, 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 51 (2005).

Adam Wolfson, Electronic Fingerprints: Doing Away with the Conception of Computer-Generated Records as Hearsay, 104 MICH. L. REV. 151 (2005).

2.2.2 Audio/Visual Evidence

Intercepted Electronic Communications Were Properly Excluded in Divorce Proceedings, 48 LAW REP. 121 (2005).

2.3 Cameras in the Courtroom

Aaron Harmon, Child Testimony Via Two-Way Closed Circuit Television: A New Perspective on Maryland v. Craig in United States v. Turning Bear and United States v. Bordeaux, 7 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 157 (2005).

Frederic I. Lederer, High-Tech Trial Lawyers and the Court: Responsibilities, Problems, and Opportunities, FED. LAW., Aug. 2005, at 41.

2.4 Dispute Resolution

Robert Ambrogi, Virtual Justice: Resolving Disputes Online, 48 RES GESTAE 41 (2005).

Luka Tadic-Colic, International Arbitration: Online Mediation: Evolution and Perspectives, 12 CROATIAN ARB. Y.B. 247 (2005).

3. Computers and Technology in the Government

3.0 General

Priya Chatwani, Retro Politics Back in Vogue: A Look at how the Internet Can Modernize the Reemerging Caucus, 14 S. CAL. INTERDIS. L.J. 313 (2005).

Leslie Gielow Jacobs, A Troubling Equation in Contracts for Government Funded Scientific Research: "Sensitive But Unclassified" = Secret But Unconstitutional, 1 J. NAT'L SEC. L. & POL'Y 113 (2005).

3.1 Computers and Technology in Law Enforcement

3.1.0 General

John T. Soma, Balance of Privacy vs. Security: A Historical Perspective of the USA Patriot Act, 31 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 285 (2005).

David J. S. Ziff, Note, Fourth Amendment Limitations on the Execution of Computer Searches Conducted Pursuant to a Warrant, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 841 (2005).

3.1.1 Computers and Technology in Police Operation

Tenison Craddock, Casenote, The Limitations on Police Regarding GPS Tracking Devices: A Necessary Hindrance? 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 505 (2005).

Kathleen Hartford, Lisa Heslop, Larry Stitt & Jeffrey S. Hoch, Design of an Algorithm to Identify Persons with Mental Illness in a Police Administrative Database, 28 INT'L J.L. & PSYCHIATRY 1 (2005).

M.B. Illes, A.L. Carter, P.L. Laturnus and A.B. Yamashita, Use of the Backtrack[TM] Computer Program for Bloodstain Pattern Analysis of Stains from Downward-Moving Drops, 38(4) CAN. Soc. FORENSIC SCI. (2005).

Orin S. Kerr, Searches and Seizures in a Digital World, 119 HARV. L. REV. 531 (2005).

Shannon L. McCarthy, Criminal Procedure--Not There Yet: Police Interrogations Should Be Electronically Recorded or Excluded from Evidence at Trial--Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 813 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 2004), 39 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 333 (2005).

Nicolas Nohlen, Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case, 3 INT'L J. CONST. L. 680 (2005).

Adina Schwartz, A Systemic Challenge to the Reliability and Admissibility of Firearms and Toolmark Identification, 6 COLUM. SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 2 (2005).

3.1.2 Computers and Technology in Correctional Institutions Ralph Kirkland Gable & Robert S. Gable, Electronic Monitoring." Positive Intervention Strategies, FED. PROBATION, June 2005, at 21.

3.2 Use of Computers and Technology by Federal Departments and Agencies

3.2.0 General

Daniel Inkelas, Note, Security, Sound, and Cetaceans: Legal Challenges to Low Frequency Active Sonar Under U.S. and International Environmental Law, 37 GEO. WASH. INT'L L. REV. 207 (2005).

Duncan Matthews, TRIPS Flexibilities and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries." The Problem with Technical Assistance and Free Trade Agreements, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 420 (2005).

Christopher Guttman-McCabe, Amy Mushahwar & Patrick Murck, Homeland Security and Wireless Telecommunications: The Continuing Evolution of Regulation, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 413 (2005).

Penina Michlin, Note, The Broadcast Flag and the Scope of the FCC's Ancillary Jurisdiction: Protecting the Digital Future, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 907 (2005).

Aaron Perzanowski, Note, Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC: The Persistence of Scarcity, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 743 (2005).

Allyson Phillips, A Portal to Reliable Real Estate Data or a Door to Nowhere? A Look at How State and Local Dissemination Policies Have Impacted the Development of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure and Geospatial One-Stop Portal, 34 REAL EST. L.J. 9 (2005).

3.2.1 Military Technology

Stephen J. Cox, Comment, Confronting Threats Through Unconventional Means: Offensive Information Warfare as a Covert Alternative to Preemptive War, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 881 (2005).

Vida M. Antolin-Jenkins, Defining the Parameters of Cyberwar Operations: Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places ? 51 NAVAL L. REV. 132 (2005).

John Siemietkowski, Contract And Fiscal Law Developments of 2004-The Year in Review: Special Topics: Information Technology (IT), 2005 ARMY LAW. 142 (2005).

Christine C. Trend, Killing the Goose that Laid the Golden Egg: Data Rights Law and Policy in Department of Defense Contracts, 34 PUB. CON. L.J. 287 (2005).

3.2.2 Internal Revenue Service

3.2.3 U.S. Patent Office

3.2.4 Government Information Retrieval System

Candice Spurlin, Permanent Public Access to Electronic Government Documents: South Dakota's Response to a National Dilemma, 50 S.D.L. REV. 113 (2005).

3.3 Use of Computers and Technology in Judicial Administration

3.4 Use of Computers and Technology by State and Federal Legislatures

Jared Chrislip, Filtering the Internet Like a Smokestack: How the Children's Internet Protection Act Suggests a New Internet Regulation Analogy, 5 J. HIGH TECH. L. 261 (2005).

Brian Fitzgerald & Nic Suzor, Legal Issues for the Use of Free and Open Source Software in Government, 29 MELBOURNE U. L.R. 412 (2005).

Daniel B. Carrie & Matthew J. Armstrong, Electronic Discovery and the Challenge Posed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2005 UCLA J.L. & TECH 2 (2005).

Gregory N. Mandel, Technology Wars: The Failure of Democratic Discourse, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 117 (2005).

4. Legal Issues of Computer and Technology Sales, Usage, and Services

4.0 General

David A. Heiner, Antitrust: Assessing Tying Claims in the Context of Software Integration: A Suggested Framework for Applying the Rule of Reason Analysis, 72 U. CHI. L. REV. 123 (2005).

Rob Sayles, Casenote, Ninth Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Jailhouse Webcams, 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 521 (2005).

4.1 Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Computer Services

4.1.0 General

Elizabeth Macdonald, Bugs and Breaches, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 118 (2005).

4.1.1 Purchase, Lease and License Considerations

4.1.2 Limitations of Limited Warranties

4.2 Government Regulation of Computer-Related Industry

4.2.0 General

Jack M. Balkin, Law and Liberty in Virtual Worlds, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 63 (2005).

Roger Allan Ford, Preemption of State Spam Laws by Federal CAN-SPAM Act, 72 U. CHI. L. REV. 355 (2005).

W. Parker Baxter, Increasing Access to Health Care: Methods to Address the National Crisis: Recent Development: Has Spam Been Canned? Consumers, Marketers, and the Making of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 8 N.Y.U.J. LEGIS. & PUB. POLICY 163 (2004-2005).

Richard Cullen, China's Media: The Impact of the Internet, 6 SAN DIEGO INT'L L.J. 323 (2005).

R. Alex DuFour, Comment, Voice Over Internet Protocol: Ending Uncertainty and Promoting Innovation through a Regulatory Framework, 13 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 471 (2005).

Justin D. Fitzdam, Note, Private Enforcement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Effective Without Government Intervention, 90 CORNELL L. REV. 1085 (2005).

Saby Ghoshray, Symposium: The Common Law of Contracts as a Worm Force in Two Ages of Revolution: A Conference Celebrating the 150th Anniversary of Hadley v. Baxendale: The Boundaries of Contract in a Global Economy: Cyberspace Contracting: Embracing Incomplete Contract Paradigm in the Wake of UCITA Experience, 11 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 609 (2005).

Jennifer Stisa Granick, Price of Restricting Vulnerability Publications, 9 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 10 (2005).

Joanne Holman & Michael A. McGregor, The Internet as Commons: The Issue of Access, 10 COMM. L. & POL'Y 267 (2005).

Andrew F. Knight, Software, Components, and Bad Logic: Recent Interpretations of Section 271(F), 87 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 493 2005.

Ola O. Olatawura, Why There May Not be an Extraterritorial Sport Right to Online Gambling, 27 LOY. L.A. INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 371 (2005).

Benjamin Channing Palmer, Disparate Impact of Electronic Signature Legislation on Indigent Californians, 36 MCGEORGE L. REV. 697 (2005).

Richard J. Peltz, Pieces of Pico: Saving Intellectual Freedom in the Public School Library, 2005 BYU EDUC. & L. J. 103.

Robert T. Razzano, Error 404 Jurisdiction not Found." The Ninth Circuit Frustrates the Efforts of Yahoo! Inc. To Declare A Speech-Restrictive Foreign Judgment Unenforceable, 73 U. CIN. L. REV. 1743 (2005).

Robert M. Sieg, Attempted Possession of Child Pornography--A Proposed Approach for Criminalizing Possession of Child Pornographic Images of Unknown Origin, 36 U. TOL. L. REV. 263 (2005).

Hannah R. Short, Implications of Grokster for Online Ticket Sale Companies: Why Online Ticket Resale Sites Should be Held Liable for Violating State Scalping Laws, 7 N.C. J.L. & TECH. 181 (2005).

Jacob A. Sosnay, Comments Regulating Minors' Access to Pornography via the Internet: What Options do Congress Have Left? 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 453 (2005).

Curtis Summers, Porn Impacts the Spending Power? The Children's Internet Protection Act and Dole's Need for Practical "Bite," 53 KAN. L. REV. 509 (2005).

Nicos L. Tsilas, Threat to Innovation, Interoperability, and Government Procurement Options From Recently Proposed Definitions of "Open Standards," 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 8 (2005).

Alexander Urbelis, Toward A More Equitable Prosecution of Cybercrime: Concerning Hackers, Criminals, and The National Security, 29 VT. L. REV. 975 (2005).

4.2.1 First Amendment Issues

Senator Dick Ackerman, Is Anything Obscene Anymore." Article: Technology & Obscenity." Ever-Changing Legal Challenges, 10 NEXUS J. OP. 37 (2005).

Marvin Ammori, Another Worthy Tradition: How the Free Speech Curriculum Ignores Electronic Media and Distorts Free Speech Doctrine, 70 MO. L. REV. 59 (2005).

Joshua Azriel, The Internet and Hate Speech." An Examination of the Nuremberg Files Case, 10 COMM. L. & POL'Y 477 (2005).

Jane Bailey, Constitutional Advancement of Women's E-Quality: Responding to Challenges and Seizing Opportunities, 9 QUEEN'S L.J. 660 (2005).

Clay Calvert and Robert D. Richards, Mediated Images of Violence and the First Amendment: From Video Games to the Evening News, 57 ME. L. REV. 91 (2005).

Michael B. Cassidy, To Surf and Protect: The Children's Internet Protection Act Policies Material Harmful to Minors and a Whole Lot More, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 437 (2005).

Sandy S. Li, Note, The Need for a New, Uniform Standard." The Continued Threat to Internet Related Speech, 26 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 65 (2005).

Martha McCarthy, The Continuing Saga of Internet Censorship: The Child Online Protection Act, 2005 BYU EDUC. & L. J. 83 (2005).

James P. Nehf, Incomparability and the Passive Virtues of Ad Hoc Privacy, 76 U. COLO. L. REV. 1 (2005).

Audrey Rogers, Playing Hide and Seek: How to Protect Virtual Pornographers And Actual Children On The Internet, 50 VILL. L. REV. 87 (2005).

Paul E. Salamanca, Video Games As A Protected Form of Expression, 40 GA. L. REV. 153 (2005).

Heidi Wachs, Note, Permissive Pornography: The Selective Censorship of the Internet Under CIPA, 11 CARDOZO WOMEN'S L.J. 441 (2005).

Lawrence G. Walters & Clyde DeWitt, Obscenity in the Digital Age: The Re-Evaluation of Community Standards, 10 NEXUS J. Op. 59 (2005).

Tara Wheatland, Note, Ashcroft v. ACLU: In Search of Plausible, Less Restrictive Alternatives, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 371 (2005).

Robin S. Whitehead, "Carnal Knowledge" Is the Key. A Discussion of How Non-Geographic Miller Standards Apply to the Internet, 10 NEXUS J. OP. 49 (2005).

4.2.2 Antitrust

Eddy Hsu, Comment, Antitrust Regulation Applied to Problems in Cyberspace: iTunes and iPod, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 117 (2005).

David McGowan, Between Logic and Experience: Error Costs and United States v. Microsoft Corp., 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1185 (2005).

Jonathan A. Mukai, Note, Joint Ventures and the Online Distribution of Digital Content, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 781 (2005).

Toshiaki Takigawa, A Comparative Analysis of U.S., E.U., and Japanese Microsoft Cases: How to Regulate Exclusionary Conduct by a Dominant Firm in a Network Industry, 50 ANTITRUST BULL. 237 (2005).

4.2.3 FCC Regulation

Ian J. Antonoff, Comment, You Don't Like it ... Change the (expletive deleted) Channel!: An Analysis of the Constitutional Issues That Plague FCC Enforcement Actions and a Proposal for Deregulation in Favor of Direct Consumer Control, 15 SETON HALL J. SPORTS L. 253 (2005).

Adam Cain, Satellite Radio: An Innovative Technology's Path through the FCC and into the Future, 25 J. NAT'L. ASSOC. ADMIN. L. JUDGES 223 (2005).

Doris Chen, Tim Huang and Dennis Fernandez, Strategic Balancing of Patents and the Wireless Technology Revolution to Maximize Market Exclusivity, 87 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 5 (2005).

Andrew D. Cotlar, The Road to Analog Switch-Off How the United States Can Turn Off Analog Television without Significant Service Disruption, 13 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 271 (2005).

Mathew A. Goldberg, Message in a Bottleneck: The Need for FCC-Mandated Interoperability Among Instant Message Providers, 9 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 133 (2005).

Matthew C. Holohan, Note, Politics, Technology, & Indecency: Rethinking Broadcast Regulation in the 21st Century, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 341 (2005).

Erik S. Johnson, Note, "It's Electric!": An Argument For Certainty and Parity in Regulation To Welcome The New Age Of Broadband Delivery--Broadband Over Power Lines, 39 CA. L. REV. 1401 (2005).

Cuong Lam Nguyen, Comment, A Postmortem of the Digital Television Broadcast Flag, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 1129 (2005).

Andrew Sperry, Smut in Space: The FCC and Free Speech on Satellite Radio, 17 LOY. CONSUMER L REV. 531 (2005).

Kevin Werbach, The Federal Computer Commission, 84 N.C.L. REV. 1 (2005).

4.2.4 SEC Regulation

4.2.5 Tariff and Trade Control

4.3 Substantive Law Aspects

4.3.0 General

Peter K. Yu, P2P and The Future of Private Copying, 76 U. COLO. L. REV. 653 (2005).

4.3.1 Computer Crime

Valerie Alter, Note, Jailhouse Informants: A Lesson In E-Snitching, 10 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 223 (2005).

Ryan Y. Blumel, Twentieth Survey of White Collar Crime: Mail and Wire Fraud, 42 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 677, 2005.

Richard W. Downing, Shoring Up the Weakest Link: What Lawmakers Around the World Need to Consider in Developing Comprehensive Laws to Combat Cybercrime, 43 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 705 (2005).

Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig, The Tort of Negligent Enablement of Cybercrime, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1553 (2005).

Michael C. Shue, Casenote, United States v. Martignon: The First Case to Rule that the Federal Anti-Bootlegging Statute Is Unconstitutional Copyright Legislation, 60 U. MIAMI L. REV. 131, Oct. 2005.

John Spence, Pennsylvania and Pornography: CDT v. Pappert Offers a New Approach to Criminal Liability Online, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 411 (2005).

Jacqueline B. Watanabe, Real Problems, Virtual Solutions: The (Still) Uncertain Future Of Virtual Child Pornography Legislation, 10 J. TECH. L. &

POL'Y 195 (2005).

Kam C. Wong & Georgiana Wong, Law and Order in Cyberspace: A Case Study of Cyberspace Governance in Hong Kong, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 249 (2005).

4.3.2 Computer-Related Product Liability

Laura E. Hancock, Contributory and Vicarious Copyright Infringement as Applied to Auctions, Flea Markets, and Swap Meets: How Fonovisa and Napster Have Set the Standard, 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 295 (2005).

Frances E. Zollers, Andrew McMullin, Sandra N. Hurd, & Peter Shears, No More Soft Landings For Software: Liability For Defects in an Industry That Has Come of Age, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 745 (2005).

4.3.3 Computer Security

Alfred Cheng, Does Spybot Finally Have Some Allies?: An Analysis of Current Spyware Legislation, 58 SMU L. REV. 1497 (2005).

Vincent R. Johnson, Cybersecurity, Identity Theft, and the Limits of Tort Liability, 57 S.C.L. REV. 255 (2005).

Benjamin J. Patterson, Spyware: Covertly Infriging on Your Internet Privacy While Circumventing the Federal Legislation Radar, 54 DRAKE L. REV. 233 (2005).

4.3.4 Taxation of Software

4.4 Problems of Privacy and Computers

4.4.0 General

Joshua Azriel, The Internet and Hate Speech. An Examination of the Nuremberg Files Case, 10 COMM. L. & POL'Y 477 (2005).

Daniel Benoliel, Law, Geography and Cyberspace: The Case of On-Line Territorial Privacy, 23 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 125 (2005).

Jerry Birenz, Is Anything "Personal" in Cyberspace? 23 COMM. LAW. 2 (2005).

Simone Francesco Bonetti, European Union Legislation & Free Contracts for Internet Access in the United States and Italy: Towards a Consumer Rights Framework, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 4 (2005).

Michael E. Burke, Demetrios Eleftheriou, Marco Berliri & Giulio Coraggio, Information Services, Technology, and Data Protection, 39 INT'L LAW. 403 (2005).

Camille Caiman, Spy vs. Spouse: Regulating Surveillance Software on Shared Marital Computers, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 2097 (2005).

Toni Carbo, Anonymity in the Digital Age, A.B.A. SCITECH LAW., Summer 2005, at 4.

Julie E. Cohen, Comment, Copyright's Public-Private Distinction, 55 CASE W. RES. 963 (2005).

Susan P. Crawford, First Do No Harm: The Problem of Spyware, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1433 (2005).

Shubhankar Dam, Remedying A Technological Challenge: Individual Privacy And Market Efficiency," Issues And Perspectives On The Law Relating To Data Protection, 15 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 337 (2005).

Frederic Debussere, E.U. E-Privacy Directive: A Monstrous Attempt to Starve the Cookie Monster? 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 70 (2005).

Kristen E. Edmundson, Note, Global Positioning System Implants: Must Consumer Privacy Be Lost in Order for People to Be Found? 38 IND. L. REV. 207 (2005).

Gal Eschet, FIPs and PETs for RFID: Protecting Privacy in the Web of Radio Frequency Identification, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 301 (2005).

Lawrence M. Friedman, The Scholarship of Lawrence M. Friedman: The Eye That Never Sleeps: Privacy and Law in the Internet Era, 40 TULSA L. REV. 461 (2005).

Daniel B. Garrie, Voice Over Internet Protocol and the Wiretap Act: Is Your Conversation Protected? 29 SEATTLE U. L.REV. 97 (2005).

Matthew A. Goldberg, Comment, The Googling of Online Privacy: GMAIL, Search-Engine Histories and the New Frontier of Protecting Private Information on the Web, 9 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 249 (2005).

Stephen E. Henderson, Nothing New Under the Sun? A Technologically Rational Doctrine of Fourth Amendment Search, 56 MERCER L. REV. 507 (2005).

David Hricik & Amy Falkingham, Lawyers Still Worry Too Much About Transmitting E-Mail Over The Internet, 10 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 265 (2005).

Ronald Leenes & Bert-Jaap Koops, "Code." Privacy's Death or Saviour? 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 329 (2005).

Reuven R. Levary, Radio Frequency Identification: Legal Aspects, 12 RICH. J.L & TECH. 6 (2005).

Gary T. Marx, Seeing Hazily (But Not Darkly) Through the Lens: Some Recent Empirical Studies of Surveillance Technologies, 30 LAW & SOC. INQUIRY 339 (2005) (reviewing JOHN GILLIOM, OVERSEERS OF THE POOR (2002)).

Peter S. Menell, Regulating "Spyware.'" The Limitations of State "Laboratories" and the Case for Federal Preemption of State Unfair Competition Laws, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1363 (2005).

April A. Otterberg, Note, GPS Tracking Technology: The Case for Revisiting Knotts and Shifting the Supreme Court's Theory of the Public Space Under the Fourth Amendment, 46 B.C. L. REV. 661 (2005).

Paul M. Schwartz, Privacy Inalienability and the Regulation of Spyware, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1269 (2005).

Monica R. Shah, Note, The Case for a Statutory Suppression Remedy to Regualte Illegal Private Party Searches in Cyberspace, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 250 (2005).

K.A. Taipale, Technology, Security and Privacy." The Fear of Frankenstein, the Mythology of Privacy and the Lessons of King Ludd, 9 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 8 (2005).

Colin Tapper, Out of the Box, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 5 (2005).

Michael L. Van Cise, The Georgia Open Records Law Electronic Signature Exception: The Intersection of Privacy, Technology, and Open Records, 12 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 567 (2005).

Jane K. Winn, Contracting SpywareContract, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1345 (2005).

Ian Wood, An Unreasonable Online Search: How A Sheriff's Webcams Strengthened Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights of Pre-Trial Detainees, 35 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. 1 (2005).

4.4.1 Data Privacy

Cynthia Blum, Bank Deposit Information With Other Countries: Should Tax Compliance or Privacy Claims Prevail? 6 FLA. TAX REV. 579 (2004).

Bryan G. Bosta, Commentary, Bringing Article 9 Up to Speed. The Need For A National Filing System, 31 DAYTON L. REV. 25 (2005).

Jay Campbell, Protecting the Future: A Strategy for Creating Laws Not Constrained by Technological Obsolescence, 7 VAND. J. ENT. L. & PRAC. 533 (2005).

Susan P. Crawford, Who's in Charge of Who I Am?: Identity and Law Online, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 211 (2005).

Sasha K. Danna, Note, The Impact of Electronic Discovery on Privilege and the Applicability of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 38 LOY. L.A. L. REV. 1683 (2005).

Seth P. Hobby, EU Data Protection Directive: Implementing a Worldwide Data Protection Regime and How the U.S. Position Has Progressed, 1 INT'L L. & MGMT. REV. 155 (2005).

Justin Kent Holcombe, Solutions for Regulating Offshore Outsourcing in the Service Sector: Using the Law, Market, International Mechanisms, and Collective Organization as Building Blocks, 7 U. PA. J. LAB. & EMP. L. 539 (2005).

Bruce H. Nearon, Jon Stanley, Steven W. Teppler, & Joseph Burton, Life after Sarbanes-Oxley: The Merger of Information Security and Accountability, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 379 (2005).

Jorg Rehder & Erika C. Collins, Legal Transfer of Employment-Related Data To Outside the European Union: Is It Even Still Possible? 39 INT'L LAW. 129 (2005).

YiJun Tian, Reform of Existing Database Legislation and Future Database Legislation Strategies: Towards a Better Balance In the Database Law, 31 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 347 (2005).

Richard Warner, Surveillance and the Self: Privacy, Identity, and Technology, 54 DEPAUL L. REV. 847 (2005).

Joeson Wong Ka Yu, Electronic Government and Its Implication for Data Privacy in Hong Kong: Can Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Protect the Privacy of Personal Information in Cyberspace? 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 143 (2005).

4.4.2 Governmental Invasion of Privacy

New Hampshire: Cell Phone User Has No Right of Privacy, 33 Juv. JUST. DIG. 6 (2005).

Patricia L. Bellia, Spyware and the Limits of Surveillance Law, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1283 (2005).

Francesca Bignami, Transgovernmental Networks vs. Democracy: The Case of the European Information Privacy Network, 26 MICH. J. INT'L L. 807 (2005).

Susan W. Brenner, The Fourth Amendment in an Era of Ubiquitous Technology, 75 MISS. L.J. 1 (2005).

Thomas K. Clancy, The Fourth Amendment Aspects of Computer Searches and Seizures: A Perspective and a Primer, 75 MISS. L.J. 193 (2005).

John T. Cross, Age Verification in the 21st Century: Swiping Away your Privacy, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 363 (2005).

John S. Ganz, Comment, It's Already Public: Why Federal Officers Should Not Need Warrants to Use GPS Vehicle Tracking Devices, 95 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1325 (2005).

Marc M. Harrold, Computer Searches of Probationers--Diminished Privacies, "Special Needs" & "Whilst' Quiet Pedophiles"--Plugging the Fourth Amendment into the "Virtual Home Visit," 75 MISS. L.J. 273 (2005).

David McPhie, Almost Private: Pen Registers, Packet Sniffers, and Privacy at the Margin, 2005 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 1 (2005).

Nicolas Nohlen, Germany: The Electronic Eavesdropping Case, 3 INT'L J. CONST. L. 680 (2005).

Christopher Slobogin, Transaction Surveillance by the Government, 75 MISS. L.J. 139 (2005).

Lee Tien, Doors, Evelopes, and Encryption: The Uncertain Role of Precautions in Fourth Amendment Law, 54 DEPAUL L. REV. 873 (2005).

Jason M. Young, Surfing While Muslim: Privacy, Freedom of Expression & the Unintended Consequences of Cybercrime Legislation: A Critical Analysis of the Council of Europe Convention on Cyber-Crime & the Canadian Lawful Access Proposal, 9 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 9 (2005).

4.4.3 Credit Reference

Symposium, Credit Report and Privacy, 59 CONSUMER FIN. L.Q. REP. 229 (2005).

5. Computers and Technology in Education

5.0 General

Gabrielle Hammond, Youth in the Digital Era, CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW, Jul.-Aug. 2005.

Mary Whisner, Cool Web Sites, 97 L. LIBR. J. 721 (2005).

Michelle M. Wu, Why Print and Electronic Resources are Essential to the Academic Law Library, 97 LAW LIBR. J. 233 (2005).

5.1 Legal Education

Robert Ambrogi, Correspondence Courses for the Internet era, 49 RES GESTAE 23 (2005).

Marvin Ammori, Another Worthy Tradition: How the Free Speech Curriculum Ignores Electronic Media and Distorts Free Speech Doctrine, 70 MO. L. REV. 59 (2005).

Fran Ansley & Cathy Cochran, What Is an Ethic of Teaching?: Going On-line With Justice Pedagogy: Four Ways of Looking At A Website, 50 VILE. L. REV. 875 (2005).

Sefton Bloxham, Widening Access and the Use of ICT in Legal Education, 39 LAW TCHR. 93 (2005).

Randy Diamond, Advancing Public Interest Practitioner Research Skills in Legal Education, 7 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 67 (2005).

H. Brian Holland, Inherently Dangerous: The Potential for an Internet-Specific Standard Restricting Speech That Performs a Teaching Function, 39 U.S.F.L. REV. 353 (2005).

Thomas Keefe, Teaching Legal Research from the Inside Out, 97 LAW LIBR. J. 117 (2005).

MJ Le Brun & Anne Macduff, Developing the Reflective Practitioner Online (In Law), 39 LAW TCHR. 17 (2005).

Peter W. Martin, Cornell's Experience Running Online, Inter-School Law Courses--An FAQ, 39 LAW TCHR. 70 (2005).

John Mayer, CODEC: Lowering Barriers to Inter-Institutional Distance Legal Education, 39 LAW TCHR. 82 (2005).

Patricia McKellar & Paul Maharg, Virtual Learning Environments: The Alternative to the Box Under the Bed, 39 LAW TCHR. 43 (2005).

Antoinette J. Muntjewerff & Jeroen J. Leijen, Unplugging Blackboard, 39 LAW TCHR. 57 (2005).

Rob Nadolski & Jurgen Woretshofer, Use of ICT in the Training of Legal Skills, 39 LAW TCHR. 29 (2005).

Mary Rumsey & April Schwartz, Paper Versus Electronic Sources for Law Review Cite Checking: Should Paper Be the Gold Standard? 97 LAW LIBR. J. 31 (2005).

6. Computers and Technology in Business

6.0 General

Gary R. Duvall, Using the Web More Effectively, 24 FRANCHISE L.J. 173 (2005).

John M. Eden, When Big Brother Privatizes: Commercial Surveillance, the Privacy Act of 1974, and the Future of RFID, 205 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 20 (2005).

Harold Evensky, The Future Ain't What it Used to Be, 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 16 (2005).

Dimitrios Fiotakis, The Impact of Information Technology Upon the Shipbroking Profession, 29 MAR. LAW. 237 (2005).

Donald P. Harris, Daniel B. Garrie & Matthew J. Armstrong, Sexual Harassment: Limiting The Affirmative Defense in The Digital Workplace, 39 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 73 (2005).

Ann C. Hodges & Porcher L. Taylor, III, The Business Fallout from the Rapid Obsolescence and Planned Obsolescence of High-Tech Products: Downsizing of Noncompetition Agreements, 6 COLUM. SCI. & TECH. L. REV. 3 (2005).

Ross Lasley, Don't Fall Behind the Curve in Creating Web Sites that Drive Business, 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 39 (2005).

Ross Lasley, Segment that List Like a Professional Geek to Improve Your Sales Efficiency, 59 J. FIN. SERF. PROF. 39 (2005).

Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, The Scope of Open Source Licensing, 21 J.L. ECON. & ORG. 20 (2005).

Edward A. Moses, J. Clay Singleton and Stewart Andrew Marshall, III, Computing Market Adjusted Damages in Fiduciary Surcharge Cases Using Modern Portfolio Theory, 31.1 ACTEC J. 60 (2005).

Michael L. Rustad & Sandra R. Paulsson, Monitoring Employee E-mail and Internet Usage: Avoiding the Omniscient Electronic Sweatshop: Insights from Europe, 7 U. PA. J. LAB. & EMP. L. 829 (2005).

Patrick S. Ryan, European Spectrum Management Principles, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 277 (2005).

Leanne Stendell, Internet Pop-Up Advertisement Triggered by Competitor's Trademarks is Not Infringing "Use in Commerce" of the Marks, 58 SMU L. REV. 215 (2005).

Richard M. Weber, Spring Cleaning, 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 39 (2005).

Christopher Wolf, A Comment on Private Harms in the Cyber-World, 62 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 355 (2005).

6.1 Electronic Commerce

Ruwantissa Abeyratne, Electronic Ticketing--Current Legal Issues, 70 J. AIR L. & COM. 141 (2005).

Warren E. Agin, Electronic Signatures and Instruments, 14 J. BANKR. L. & PRAC. 2 Art. 3 (2005).

Warren E. Agin & Scott N. Kumis, A Framework for Understanding Electronic Information Transactions, 15 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 277 (2005).

Rachelle Andrews, Electronic Commerce: Lessons Learned from the European Legal Model, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 81 (2005).

Susan Barkehall, Electronic Funds Transfer and Fiduciary Fraud, 2005 J. BUS. L. 1.

Stephen E Blythe, Digital Signature Law of the United Nations, European union, United Kingdom and United States: Promotion of Growth in E-Commerce with Enhanced Security, 11 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 6 (2005).

Zhang Chu & Lingfei Lei, The Chinese Approach to Electronic Transactions Legislation, 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 333 (2005).

Clayton P. Gillette, Pre-Approved Contracts for Internet Commerce, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 975 (2005).

Daniel J. Glantz, Note, For-Bid Scalping Online?: Anti-Scalping Legislation in an Internet Society, 23 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 261 (2005).

Julia Hornle, Country Of Origin Regulation In Cross-Border Media: One Step Beyond The Freedom To Provide Services? 54 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 89 (2005).

Robert L. Oakley, Fairness in Electronic Contracting: Minimum Standards for Non-Negotiated Contracts, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 1041 (2005).

David Andrew Poyton, Dematerialized Goods and Liability in the Electronic Environment: The Truth Is, "There Is No Spoon (Box)," 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 83 (2005).

Kenn Beam Tacchino, Envisioning the Society in 2015, 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 8 (2005).

Yun Zhao, Liberalization of Electronic Commerce in Mainland China and Hong Kong under the WTO-CEPA Regime, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 183 (2005).

6.2 Computers in Banking and Finance

6.2.0 General

James F. Bauerle, Pareto Optimum or Not? Regulating Business Method Patents in Electronic Financial Services, 122 BANKING L.J. 670 (2005).

James F. Bauerle, SPeRS Revisited. Establishing Standards to Assure Enforceable Electronic Financial Transactions, 122 BANKING L.J. 1033 (2005).

Stephen J. Ciccone & Thomas A. Rocco, The Tech Industry or the Regulated Industry: Which One Has the True Glamour Stocks? 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 64 (2005).

Mark T. Gillett, Obrea O. Poindexter, & M. Sean Ruff, Developments in Cyberbanking, 60 BUS. LAW. 757 (2005).

James Steven Rogers, The New Old Law of Electronic Money, 58 SMU L. REV. 1253 (2005).

Richard M. Weber, Can't Help Loving that MAC of Mine, 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 38 (2005).

Richard M. Weber, When is a Premium Not a Premium? 59 J. FIN. SERV. PROF. 34 (2005).

6.2.1 On-line Securities Trading

6.3 Computers and Technology in the Transportation Industry

Jack Harrington, Very Light Jet Technology and Training and the Effect on Aviation Insurance Underwriting: The Eclipse Aviation Perspective, 20 AIR & SPACE LAW. 8 (2005).

6.4 Computers and Technology in the Publishing Industry

Gabe Bloch, Note, Transformation in Publishing: Modeling the Effect of New Media, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 647 (2005).

6.5 Computers and Technology in Advertising

Patrick Frye, An Internet Advertising Service Can Constitute "Use In Commerce," 22 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 89 (2005).

Taiwo A. Oriola, Regulating Unsolicited Commercial Electronic Mail in the United States and the European Union: Challenges and Prospects, 7 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 113 (2005).

Jennifer Yannone, The Future of Unauthorized Pop-Up Advertisements Remains Uncertain As Courts Reach Conflicting Outcomes, 7 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 281 (2005).

6.6 Computers and Technology in Accounting

7. Intellectual Property Protection of Computer and Technology

7.0 General

Bryan Bergman, Into the Grey: The Unclear Laws of Digital Sampling, 27 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 619 (2005).

Alan Cunningham, Rights Expression on Digital Communication Networks: Some Implications for Copyright, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 1 (2005).

Shubha Ghosh, Patent Law and the Assurance Game: Refitting Intellectual Property in the Box of Regulation, 18 CAN. J.L. & JURIS. 307 (2005).

David Kostiner, Comment, Will Mechanicals Break the Digital Machine?: Determining a Fair Mechanical Royalty Rate for Permanent Digital Phonographic Downloads, 27 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 653 (2005).

G. Alexander Macklin, Q.C., and Greg Beach, Pre-Trial Discovery in Canadian Intellectual Property Litigation, 22 CAN. INTELL. PROP. REV. 27 (2005).

Katherine McGinnis, Whether Sound Marks Can and/or Should Be Registered as Trade-Marks in Canada, 19 INTELL. PROP. J. 117 (2005).

David Nelson, Rethinking the Role of Copyright in an Age of Digital Distribution, 78 S. CAL. L. REV. 559 (2005).

Ned Snow, The TIVO Question: Does Skipping Commercials Violate Copyright Law? 56 SYRACUSE L. REV. 27 (2005).

Craig Steckley, MGM v. Grokster: A Disincentive for Technological Responsibility, 7 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 299 (2005).

David Webber, Intellectual Property--Challenges for the Future, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 345 (2005).

7.1 Patent

7.1.0 General

Steven Ang, Patent Term Extensions in Singapore for "Pharmaceutical Products," 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 349 (2005).

Michael D. Bednarek, Business Method Patents 101: Ten Things You Need to Know About Patents, 22 CAN. INTEL. PROP. REV. 1 (2005).

Sven J. R. Bostyn, No Cure Without Pay? Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal Concerning the Patentability of Diagnostic Methods, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 412 (2005).

Dale L. Carlson, Katarzyna Przychodzen & Petra Scamborova, Patent Linchpin for the 21st Century?--Best Mode Revisited, 45 IDEA 267 (2005).

Yar Chaikovsky & Adrian Percer, Globalization, Technology Without Boundaries & the Scope of U.S. Patent Law, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 95 (2005).

Eric B. Chen, Technology Outpacing the Law: The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 and the Outsourcing of U.S. Patent Application Drafting, 13 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 351 (2005).

Christopher A. Cotropia, "After-Arising" Technologies and Tailoring Patent Scope, 61 N.Y.U. ANN. SURV. AM. L. 151 (2005).

Tanuja V. Garde, Legal Certainty, Stare Decisis and the Doctrine of Equivalents, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 365 (2005).

Paul J. Heald, A Transaction Costs Theory of Patent Law, 66 OHIO ST. L.J. 473 (2005).

Jessica C. Kaiser, Note and Comment, What's That Mean? A Proposed Claim Construction Methodology for Phillips v. AWH Corp., 80 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 1009 (2005).

Wing H. Liang, Note, Honeywell: The Straw that may Just Break the Inventor's Back, 26 CARDOZO L. REV. 2655 (2005).

Ronald J. Mann, Do Patents Facilitate Financing in the Software Industry? 83 TEX. L. REV. 961 (2005).

Ann L. Monotii, To Make an Article for Ultimate Sale: The Secret Use Provision in the Patents Act of 1990, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 446 (2005).

Kimberly A. Moore, Worthless Patents, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1521 (2005).

Jinseok Park, Has Patentable Subject Matter Been Expanded?--A Comparative Study on Software Patent Practices in the European Patent Office, the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the Japanese Patent Office, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 336 (2005).

Jonathan Tam, Survey, Irdeto Access, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite Corp., 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 179 (2005).

Daniel A. Valenzuela, Comment, Can an Inventor Continue Protecting an Expired Patented Product Via Trade Dress Protection? 81 N. DAK. L. REV. 145 (2005).

Kimberlee G. Weatherall & Paul H. Jensen, An Empirical Investigation into Patent Enforcement in Australian Courts, 33 FED. L. REV. 239 (2005).

7.1.1 Software Patent

Scott Baker and Claudio Mezzetti, Disclosure as a Strategy in the Patent Race, 48 J. L. & ECON. 173 (2005).

Robert Bray, The European Union "Software Patents" Directive: What is It? Why is It? Where are We Now? 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 11 (2005).

Martin Campbell-Kelly & Patrick Valduriez, A Technical Critique of Fifty Software Patents, 9 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 249 (2005).

Teresa Cheung & Ruth M. Corbin, Is There a Method to the Madness? The Persisting Controversy of Patenting Business Methods, 19 INTELL. PROP. J. 29 (2005).

Braden Cox, One Bundle, Many Antitrust Laws: The Dilemma for Digital Products, 17 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L.J. 14 (2005).

Laura R. Ford, Alchemy and Patentability: Technology, "Useful Arts," and the Chimerical Mind-Machine, 42 CAL. W. L. REV. 49 (2005).

Gustavo Ghidini & Emanuela Arezzo, Patent and Copyright Paradigms vis-a-vis Derivative Innovation: The Case of Computer Programs, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 159 (2005).

Reto M. Hilty & Christophe Geiger, Patenting Software? A Judicial and Socio-Economic Analysis, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 615 (2005).

Anatoli Kalpakidou, Business Method Patents. Should They Survive in Europe? 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 206 (2005).

Martin Campbell-Kelly, Not All Bad: An Historical Perspective on Software Patents, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 191 (2005).

Justine Pila, Dispute Over the Meaning of "Invention" in Art. 52(2) EPC--The Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions in Europe, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 173 (2005).

Robert Plotkin, Software Patentability and Practical Utility: What's the Use? 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 23 (2005).

Teresa Scassa, 42 CAN. BUS. L.J. 316 (2005) (reviewing ADAM B. JAFFE & JOSH LERNER, INNOVATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS: HOW OUR BROKEN PATENT SYSTEM IS ENDANGERING INNOVATION AND PROGRESS, AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT (2004)).

Mark H. Webbink, A New Paradigm for Intellectual Property Rights in Software, 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 12 (2005).

Joachim Weyand & Heiko Haase, Patenting Computer Programs: New Challenges, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 647 (2005).

Grant C. Yang, The Continuing Debate of Software Patents and the Open Source Movement, 13 TEX. INTELL. PROP. L.J. 171 (2005).

Allen Clark Zoracki, Comment, When Is An Algorithm Invented? The Need For A New Paradigm For Evaluating An Algorithm For Intellectual Property Protection, 15 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 579 (2005).

7.1.2 Biotech Patent

Alden F. Abbott & Suzanne T. Michel, Right Balance of Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Law: A Perspective on Settlements of Pharmaceutical Patent Litigation, 46 IDEA 1 (2005).

W.A. Adams, Comment, Confronting the Patentability Line in Biotechnology Innovation: Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, 41 CAN. Bus. L.J. 393 (2005).

David E. Adelman, A Fallacy of the Commons in Biotech Patent Policy, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 985 (2005).

Natasha N. Aljalian, The Role of Patent Scope in Biopharmaceutical Patents, 11 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 1 (2005).

Ryan J. Atkinson, Mixed Messages: Canada's Stance on Patentable Subject Matter in Biotechnology, 19 INTELL. PROP. J. 1 (2005).

Bradly Condon, Global Diseases, Global Patents and Differential and Tapen Sinha Treatment in WTO Law: Criteria for Suspending Patent Obligations in Developing Countries, 26 NW. J. INT'L. L. & BUS. 1 (2005).

Natalie M. Derzko, Impact of Recent Reforms of the Hatch-Waxman Scheme on Orange Book Strategic Behavior and Pharmaceutical Innovation, 45 IDEA 165 (2005).

Ruth E. Freeburg, Note, No Safe Harbor and No Experimental Use: Is It Time for Compulsory Licensing of Biotech Tools? 53 BUFF. L. REV. 351 (2005).

Mikyung Kim, An Overview of the Regulation and Patentability of Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research In the U.S. and Anti-Cloning Legislation in South Korea, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 645 (2005).

Alison Ladd, Comment, Integra v. Merck: Effects on the Cost and Innovation of New Drug Products, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 311 (2005).

John C. Low, Comment, Finding the Right Tool for the Job: Adequate Protection for Research Tool Patents in a Global Market? 27 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 345 (2005).

Carrie A. Morgan, Casenote, After The Fire and, Rain, Lilly Still Stands, 31 DAYTON L. REV. 127, (2005).

Sina Muscati, Terminator Technology: Protection of Patents or a Threat to the Patent System? 45 IDEA 477 (2005).

Dianne Nicol & Jane Nielsen, Australian Medical Biotechnology: Navigating a Complex Patent Landscape, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 313 (2005).

Chad D. Silker, Note, America's New War on Drugs: Should The United States Legalize Prescription Drug Reimportation? 31 J. LEGIS. 379 (2005).

Winfried Tilmann, Scope of Protection for Gene Sequence Patents, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. &

COMPETITION L. 899 (2005).

Su-Mi Yu & Han-Seop Shin, Experimental Use Exception for Research Tools, 45 IDEA 465 (2005).

7.2 Software Copyright

7.2.0 General

David W. Barnes, Comment, An Alternative Torts Model of Secondary Copyright Liability, 55 CASE W. RES. 867 (2005).

James Burger, Matthew J. Oppenheim & Michael Petricone, Sony in the Trenches, 55 CASE W. RES. 977 (2005).

Todd C. Chapman, Sharing in the Groove: Ninth Circuit Allows Peer-to-Peer Networks to Continue File-Sharing MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 4 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 304 (2005).

Anthony diFrancesca, New Use in Copyright: A Messy Case, 14 MEDIA L. & POL'Y 34 (2005).

Stacey L. Dogan & Joseph P. Liu, Copyright Law and Subject Matter Specificity: The Case of Computer Software, 61 N.Y.U. ANN. SURV. AM. L. 203 (2005).

Stacey L. Dogan, Comment, Sony, Fair Use, and File Sharing, 55 CASE W. RES. 971 (2005).

Zohar Efroni, A Momentary Lapse of Reason: Digital Copyright, the DMCA and a Dose of Common Sense, 28 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 249 (2005).

Michael A. Einhorn & Bill Rosenblatt, Peer-To-Peer Networking and Digital Rights Management: How Market Tools Can Solve Copyright Problems, 52 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 239 (2005).

Wendy J. Gordon, Keynote, Fair Use: Threat or Threatened? 55 CASE W. RES. 903 (2005).

Sonia K. Katyal, Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 222 (2005).

Matthew J. Leary, Note, Welding the Hood Shut: The Copyrightability of Operational Outputs and the Software Aftermarket in Maintenance and Operations, 85 B.U.L. REV. 1389 (2005).

Kevin M. Lemley, Eliminating Value of Infringement: An Economic Analysis of Internal Transactions and Indirect External Transactions in Software Infringement Cases, 45 IDEA 425 (2005).

Jessica Litman, The Sony Paradox, 55 CASE W. RES. 917 (2005).

Michael P. Matesky, II, Note and Comment, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Non-Infringing Use--Can Mandatory Labeling of Digital Media Products Keep the Sky from Falling? 80 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 515 (2005).

Kelly M. Maxwell, Note, Software Doesn't Infringe, Users Do? A Critical Look at MGM v. Grokster and the Recommendation of Appropriate P2P Copyright Infringement Standards, 13 COMMLAW CONSPECTUS 335 (2005).

David Moser, Free to Share?; Grokster Decision Sidesteps Innovation/Copyright Battle; Puts Focus On Business Strategies, 41 TENN. B.J. 14 (2005).

Frank Pasquale, Sony's Contribution to the Fair Use Doctrine, 55 CASE W. RES. 777 (2005).

Randal C. Picker, The Evolving Product, Phoning Home and the Duty of Ongoing Design, 55 CASE W. RES. 749 (2005).

R. Anthony Reese, Comment, The Problems of Judging Young Technologies: A Comment on Sony, Tort Doctrines, and the Puzzle of Peer-to-Peer, 55 CASE W. RES. 877 (2005).

Michael J. Remington, The Internet Challenge to the Recording and Movie Industries: A View from Washington, DC, 22 CAN. INTEL. PROP. REV. 125 (2005).

Kelly M. Slavitt, Fixation of Derivative Works in a Tangible Medium: Technology Forces a Reexamination, 46 IDEA 37 (2005).

Suzanne Sprague-Trammell, Casenote, Ninth Circuit Holds That Distributors of File-Sharing Software Are Not Liable for Their Users' Copyright Infringement: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 529 (2005).

Mitchell L. Stoltz, Note, The Penguin Paradox: How the Scope of Derivative Works in Copyright Affects the Effectiveness of the GNU GPL, 85 B.U. L. REV. 1439 (2005).

James Suh, Intellectual Property Law and Competitive Internet Advertising Technologies: Why "Legitimate" Pop-Up Advertising Practices Should Be Protected, 79 ST. JOHN'S L. REV. 161 (2005).

Maria Termini, Time-Shifting in the Internet Age: Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Television Content, 38 COLUM. J.L. & SOC. PROBS. 415 (2005).

Huei-ju Tsai, Media Neutrality in the Digital Era: A Study of the Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Issues, 5 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 46 (2005).

R. Polk Wagner, On Software Regulation, 78 S. CAL. L. REV. 457 (2005).

Alfred C. Yen, Sony, Tort Doctrines, and the Puzzle of Peer-to-Peer, 55 CASE W. RES. 815 (2005).

7.2.1 User Interface

Symposium, Regulating Digital Environments, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 807 (2005).

7.2.2 Fair Use

Joel Anderson, Note, What's Wrong with this Picture?: Dead or Alive: Protecting Actors in the Age of Virtual Reanimation, 25 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 155 (2005).

Matthew Sag, God in the Machine: A New Structural Analysis of Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 381 (2005).

David L. Wardle, Broken Record: Revisiting the Flaws in Sony's Fair Use Analysis in Light of the Grokster Decision, 26 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 1 (2005).

7.2.3 Video Game

Furine Blaise, Comment, Game Over: Issues Arising When Copyrighted Work Is Licensed to Video Game Manufacturers; 15 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 517 (2005).

7.3 Digital Copyright

7.3.0 General

Diane M. Barker, Note, Defining the Contours of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: The Growing Body of Case Law Surrounding the DMCA, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 47 (2005).

Dan L. Burk, Market Regulation and Innovation: Legal Technical Standards in Digital Rights Management Technology, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 537 (2005).

Racquel C. Callender, Note & Comment, Harmonizing Interests on the Internet: Online Users and the Music Industry, 48 HOW. L.J. 787 (2005).

Wayne Carroll, I Want My MP3: Secondary Copyright Liability in a Hidden Peer-to-Peer Network, 5 J. HIGH TECH. L. 235 (2005).

Howard Cockrill, Comment, Tuning the Dial on Internet Radio: The DPRA, the DMCA & the General Public Performance Right in Sound Recordings, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 103 (2005).

Cindy Cohn & Phil Corwin, The Induce Act Would Give Hollywood Veto Power Over New Technologies, SCITECH LAW., Spring 2005, at 9.

Robert Danay, Copyright vs. Free Expression: The Case of Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing of Music in the United Kingdom, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 2 (2005).

Zohar Efroni, Towards a Doctrine of "Fair Access" in Copyright: The Federal Circuit's Accord, 46 IDEA 99 (2005).

James Gibson, Once and Future Copyright, 81 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 167 (2005).

Kristina Groennings, Note, Costs and Benefits of the Recording Industry's Litigation Against Individuals, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 571 (2005).

Craig A. Grossman, From Sony to Grokster, The Failure of the Copyright Doctrines of Contributory Infringement and Vicarious Liability to Resolve the War Between Content and Destructive Technologies, 53 BUFF. L. REV. 141 (2005).

Nathan Grow, Note, Clearing Clearplay's Name: Tracing the Legitimization of Digital Movie Editing Technology, 2005 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 723 (2005).

David G. Grossman, Screening the Screeners, 45 IDEA 361 (2005).

Hugh G. Hansen, Marybeth Peters & Joseph Salvo, Licensing in the Digital Age: The Future of Digital Rights, 15 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1009 (2005).

Woodrow Neal Hartzog, Falling on Deaf Ears: Is the "Fail-Safe" Triennial Exemption Provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Effective in Protecting Fair Use? 12 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 309 (2005).

Justin Hughes, On the Logic of Suing One's Customers and the Dilemma of Infringement-Based Business Models, 22 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 725 (2005).

Andrew C. Humes, Note, Day the Music Died: The RIAA Sues Its Consumers, 38 IND. L. REV. 239 (2005).

Daniel S. Hurwitz, A Proposal in Hindsight: Restoring Copyright's Delicate Balance by Reworking 17 U.S.C. [section] 1201, 2005 UCLA J.L. TECH. 1 (2005).

Cassandra Imfeld & Vicotria Smith Ekstrand, The Music Industry and the Legislative Development of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act's Online Service Provider Provision, 10 COMM. L. & POL'Y 291 (2005).

Richard Jones, Entertaining Code: File Sharing, Digital Rights Management Regimes, and Criminological Theories of Compliance, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 287 (2005).

Andrew J. Lee, MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. & In re Aimster Litigation: A Study of Secondary Copyright Liability in the Peer-to-Peer Context, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 485 (2005).

Mark A. Lemley & R. Anthony Reese, A Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Peer-to-Peer Copyright Disputes, 23 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 1 (2005).

Mark Litvack, The Induce Act: Balancing Technology and Copyright, A.B.A. SCITECH LAW., Spring 2005, at 8.

Stephen Liu, Case Note, Copy Right and Copy Wrong: DVD Jon and 321 Studios Take on the Movie Industry, 39 INT'L LAW. 161 (2005).

Jolene Lau Marshall, Comment, Online Music Piracy: Can American Solutions be Exported to the People's Republic of China to Protect American Music? 14 PAC. RIM L. & POL'Y J. 189 (2005).

Lauren McBrayer, Note, The DirecTV Cases: Applying Anti-SLAPP Laws to Copyright Protection Cease-and-Desist Letters, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 603 (2005).

Charles McCarthy, Survey, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 175 (2005).

Geoffrey Neri, Note, Sticky Fingers or Sticky Norms? Unauthorized Music Downloading and Unsettled Social Norms, 93 GEO. L.J. 733 (2005).

Christopher D. Newkirk & Thomas A. Forker, License to Sample, INTELL. PROP. L. NEWSL., Spring 2005, at 1.

Gregory Scott Nortman, Indirect Liability of ISPs for Peer-to-Peer Copyright Infringement After the Verizon Decision, 7 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 249 (2005).

David W. Opderbeck, Peer-to-Peer Networks, Technological Evolution, and Intellectual Property Reverse Private Attorney General Litigation, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1685 (2005).

Jennifer D. Phillips, Comment, The Seamy Side of the Seamy Side: Potential Danger of Cyberpiracy in the Proposed ".xxx" Top Level Domain, 7 N.C.J.L. & TECH. 233 (2005).

Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, Survey, Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 185 (2005).

Dan Pontex, Comment, Rewinding Sony: Can the Supreme Court and Big Media Grok P2P? 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 159 (2005).

John A. Rothchild, Economic Analysis of Technological Protection Measures, 84 OR. L. REV. 489 (2005).

Joshua Schwartz, Thinking Outside the Pandora's Box: Why the DMCA Is Unconstitutional Under Article I, [section] 8 of the U.S. Constitution, 10 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 93 (2005).

Deborah Tussey, Technology Matters: The Courts, Media Neutrality, and New Technologies, 12 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 427 (2005).

R. Polk Wagner, Reconsidering the DMCA, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 1107 (2005).

7.3.1 Electronic Compilation

Melissa Steward, Privacy, Confidentiality, Liability, 26 J. LEGAL MED. 491 (2005).

7.3.2 Computer Database

Estelle Derclaye, Database Sui Generis Right: What Is a Substantial Investment? A Tentative Definition, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 2 (2005).

Estelle Derclaye, The Court of Justice Interprets the Database Sui Generis Right for the First Time, 30 EUR. L. REV. 420 (2005).

Jonathan Band & Jenny Marcinko, A New Perspective on Temporary Copies: The Fourth Circuit's Opinion in Costar v. Loopnet, 2005 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 2 (2005).

Amar A. Hasan, Sweating in Europe: The European Database Directive, 9 COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J. 479 (2005).

Charles C. Huse, Note, Database Protection in Theory and Practice: Three Recent Cases, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 23 (2005).

Zvi Rosen, Mod, Man, and Law: A Reexamination of the Law of Computer Game Modifications, 4 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 196 (2005).

Sharon K. Sandeen, Contract by Any Other Name Is Still a Contract: Examining the Effectiveness of Trade Secret Clauses to Protect Databases, 45 IDEA 119 (2005).

7.3.3 Multimedia

7.3.4 Computer-Generated Works

Arnold P. Lutzker & Susan J. Lutzker, Altering the contours of Copyright- The DMCA and the Unanswered Questions of Paramount Pictures Corp. v. 321 Studios, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 561 (2005).

Richard M. Myrick, Peer-to-Peer and Substantial Non-infringing Use: Giving the Term "Substantial" Some Meaning, 12 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 539 (2005).

7.4 Trademark

Benjamin Aitken, Keyword-Linked Advertising, Trademark Infringement, and Google's Contributory Liability, 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. (2005).

Bunmi Awoyemi, Zippo is Dying, Should it be Dead?: The Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction by U.S. Federal Courts over Non-Domiciliary Defendants in Trademark Infringement Lawsuits Arising out of Cyberspace, 9 MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV. 37 (2005).

Aaron Clark, Not all Edits Are Created Equal: The Edited Movie Industry's Impact on Moral Rights and Derivative Works Doctrine, 22 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 51 (2005).

W. Scott Creasman, Establishing Geographic Rights in Trademarks Based on Internet Use, 95 TRADEMARK REP. 1016 (2005).

Sarah J. Givan, Using Trademarks as a Location Tool on the Internet: Use in Commerce? 2005 UCLA J.L. TECH. 4 (2005).

Eric Goldman, Deregulating Relevancy in Internet Trademark Law, 54 EMORY L.J. 507 (2005).

Michael Handler, The Distinctive Problem of European Trade Mark Law, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 306 (2005).

Karen M. Kramer, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster--The Supreme Court's Balancing Act Between the Risks of Third-Party Liability for Copyright Infringement and Rewards of Innovation, 22 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 169 (2005).

Michael Landau, Copyrights, Moral Rights, and the End of the Right of Attribution Under US Trademark Law, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 37 (2005).

Julieta L. Lerner, Note, Trademark Infringement and Pop-up Ads: Tailoring the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis to Internet Uses of Trademarks, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 229 (2005).

Patricia Loughlin, Descriptive Trade Marks, Fair Use and Consumer Confusion, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 443 (2005).

Charles R. Macedo & Holly Pekowsky, Pop-Ups and "Use Of" a Protected Trademark in Light of 1-800 Contacts, 23 COMM. LAW., Summer 2005, at 28.

Charles McCarthy, Comment, Metatags and the Sale of Keywords in Search Engine Advertising: Confusing Consumer Confusion with Choice, 9 INTELL. PROP. L. BULL. 137 (2005).

Ned Snow, The Constitutional Failing Of The Anticybersquatting Act, 41 WILLAMETTE L. REV. 1 (2005).

Fara S. Sunderji, Protecting Online Auction Sites from the Contributory Trademark Liability Storm: A Legislative Resolution of the Tiffany, Inc. v. EBay, Inc. Problem, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 909 (2005).

Hannibal Travis, The Battle for Mindshare: The Emerging Consensus That the First Amendment Protects Corporate Criticism and Parody on the Internet, 10 VA. J.L. & TECH. 3 (2005).

David Vaver, Unconventional and Well-Known Trade Marks, SINGAPORE. J. LEGAL STUD. 1 (2005).

Recent Development: Making Your Mark On Google, 18 HARV. J. L. & TECH 479 (2005).

7.5 Trade Secret

Jonathan D. Carpenter, Comment, Intellectual Property: The Overlap Between Utility Patents, Plant Patents, the PVPA, and Trade Secrets and the Limitations on that Overlap, 81 N. DAK. L. REV. 171 (2005).

7.6 Semiconductor Chip Protection

7.7 Licensing

Richard A. Brait, Transactional Aspects of Corporate Intellectual Property Strategy, 41 CAN. Bus. L.J. 19 (2005).

Brian W. Carver, Note, Share and Share Alike: Understanding and Enforcing Open Source and Free Software Licenses, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 443 (2005).

H. Ward Classen, Open Source Licensing and Its IP Considerations, BUS. L. TODAY 9 (2005).

Tanuja V. Garde, Supporting Innovation in Targeted Treatments: Licenses of Right to NIH-Funded Research Tools, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 249 (2005).

Robert W. Gomulkiewicz, General Public License 3.0: Hacking the Free Software Movement's Constitution, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 1015 (2005).

Tomomi Harkey, Note, Bonneville International Corp. v. Peters: Considering Copyright Rules to Facilitate Licensing for Webcasting, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 625 (2005).

Andreas Heinemann, Compulsory Licences and Product Integration in European Competition Law--Assessment of the European Commission's Microsoft Decision, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 63 (2005).

John LaBarre, Ready, Set, Mark Your Patented Software! 12 RICH J.L & TECH. 3 (2005).

7.8 Intellectual Property Issues of the Internet

Timothy K. Andrews, Note, Control Content, Not Innovation: Why Hollywood Should Embrace Peer-to-Peer Technology Despite the MGM v. Grokster Battle, 25 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 383 (2005).

Stephen Bates, Coming Soon to a P.C. Near You: The Past, Present, and Future of Movie Copyright Infringement on the Internet, 5 VA. SPORTS & ENT. L.J. 97 (2005).

Michael A. Einhorn, Grokster v. Sony: The Supreme Court's Real Decision, ENT. & SPORTS LAW. 1 (2005).

William W. Fisher III, Promises To Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment, 118 HARV. L. REV. 1395.

Andrea Freeman, Note, Morris Communications v. PGA Tour: Battle Over the Rights to Real-Time Sports Scores, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 3 (2005).

D. Branch Furtado, Television: Peer-to-Peer's Next Challenge, 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 7 (2005).

Daniel C. Glazer & Dev R. Dhamija, Revisiting Initial Interest Confusion on the Internet, 95 Trademark Rep. 952 (2005).

Sonia K. Katyal, Privacy v. Piracy, 9 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 7 (2005).

Karen Kramer, Intent: The Road Not Taken In the Ninth Circuit's Post Napster Analysis of Contributory Copyright Infringement, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 525 (2005).

Joseph Gibbons Llewellyn, Digital Bowdlerizing: Removing the Naughty Bytes, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 167 (2005).

Susan Lyons, Persistent Identification of Electronic Documents and the Future of Footnotes, 97 LAW LIBR. J. 681 (2005).

Christine Pope, Unfinished Business: Are Today's P2P Networks Liable for Copyright Infringement? 2005 DUKE L. & TECH REV. 22.

Robert A. Preskill & Charles McCarthy, Google Print: Snippets of Infringement, ENT. & SPORTS LAW., 1 (Summer 2005).

Matthew J. Rust, Casenote, Nobody Uses Betamax Anymore and Neither Should the Supreme Court: Why Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. Should Be Overturned, 28 HAMLINE L. REV. 549 (2005).

Thomas J. Smedinghoff, Trends in the Law of Information Security, 17 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L.J. 1 (2005).

Deborah Tussey, Music at the Edge of Chaos: A Complex Systems Perspective on File Sharing, 37 LOY. U. CHI. L.J. 147 (2005).

Stuart Weinstein & Charles Wild, Lawrence Lessig's "Bleak House:" A Critique of "Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity" or "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Internet Law," 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 363 (2005).

Copyright Law--Ninth Circuit Holds That Computer File-Sharing Software Vendors Are Not Liable for Users' Copyright Infringement, 118 HARV. L. REV. 1761.

7.9 International Developments

7.9.0 General

John R. Crook, ed., Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: International Economic Law: U.S. Policy Regarding Internet Governance, 99 A.J.I.L. 258 (2005).

Mengfei Huang and Dennis Fernandez, A New Hero in Hollywood: Patent Protection against Piracy of Electronic Media and Creative Digital Rights, 87 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC'Y 808 (2005).

Karl Mutter, Traditional Knowledge Related to Genetic Resources and its Intellectual Property Protection in Columbia, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 327 (2005).

Roy J. Rosser, European Software Patents. When a Rejection Is Not a Rejection, INTELL. PROP. L. NEWSL. 25 (2005).

Christopher Stothers, Who Needs Intellectual Property? Competition Law and Restrictions on Parallel Trade within the European Economic Area, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 458 (2005).

Haochen Sun, Copyright Law Under Siege: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Copyright Protection in the Context of the Global Digital Divide, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 192 (2005).

7.9.1 GATT-TRIPS

David W. Childs, The World Health Organization's Prequalification Program and Its Potential Effect on Data Exclusivity Laws, 60 FOOD & DRUG L.J. 79 (2005).

Fabien Gelinas, Information Technology and International trade." Dispute Resolution as Institutionalization in International Trade and Information Technology, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 489 (2005).

Angela T. Howe, Note, United States v. Martignon & KISS Catalog v. Passport International Products: The Anti-bootlegging Statute and the Collision of International Intellectual Property Law and the United States Constitution, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 829 (2005).

Herman Cohen Jehoram, Restrictions on Copyright and Their Abuse, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 359 (2005).

Manesh Jiten Shah, Problems with sharing the pirates' booty: An analysis of TRIPS, The copyright divide between the United States and China & two potential, 5 RICH. J. GLOBAL L. & BUS. 69, (2005).

7.9.2 NAFTA

7.9.3 Developments in Canada

Olga V. Kotlyarevskaya, Note, BMG Canada, Inc. v. Doe & Society of Composers, Authors & Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Ass'n of Internet Providers: Why the Canadian Music Compensation System May Not Work in the United States, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 953 (2005).

E. Richard Gold & Karen Lynne Durell, Innovating the Skilled Reader: Tailoring Patent Law to New Technologies, 19 INTELL. PROP. J. 1 (2005).

7.9.4 Developments in Mexico and Latin America

Development in Mexico, A.B.A. SCITECH LAW. 8 (2005).

Horacio Rangel-Ortiz, New Law Governing Pharmaceutical Patents in Mexico, 36 INT'L L. REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 434 (2005).

7.9.5 Developments in Australia and New Zealand

Lucy Cradduck & Adrian Mccullagh, Designing Copyright TPM: A Mutant Digital Copyright, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 437 (2005).

Gavin R. Skene, International Law and Technology: The Extraterritorial Operation of Australian E-Commerce Legislation, 13 TUL. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 219 (2005).

7.9.6 Developments in Africa

7.9.7 Developments in Asia

Subhajit Basu & Richard Jones, Indian Information and Technology Act 2000: Review of the Regulatory Powers Under the Act, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 209 (2005).

Jashpal Kaur Bhatt, Role of Information Technology in the Malaysian Judicial System: Issues and Current Trends, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 199 (2005).

Matthew L. Goldberg, Viability of Stimulating Technology-Oriented Entrepreneurial Activity in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea: How Regulations and Culture Encourage the Creation, Development, and Exploitation of Intellectual Property, 1 INT'L L. & MGMT. REV. 1 (2005).

Jishnu Guha, Note, Time for India's Intellectual Property Regime to Grow Up, 13 CARDOZO J. INT'L & COMP. L. 225 (2005).

Emmanuel Laryea, Facilitating Paperless International Trade: A Survey of Law and Policy in Asia, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 121 (2005).

Deming Liu, Now the Wolf Has Indeed Come! Perspective on the Patent Protection of Biotechnology Inventions in China, 53 AM. J. COMP. L. 207 (2005).

Cheng Lim Saw & Winston T.H. Koh, Does P2P Have a Future? Perspectives from Singapore, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 413 (2005).

Cheng Wang, A Defenseless Policy?: An Analysis of China "s Integrated Circuit Industry Tax Rebate Programs Under WTO Laws, 30 N.C.J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 625 (2005).

7.9.8 Developments in Western Europe

Debra Brown & Euan Cameron, Designing the Interface, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 65 (2005).

Felix Rummler, Report, Computer Program Inventions Before the German Courts--A Review, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 225 (2005).

Stephen Saxby, Crown Copyright Regulation in the UK--Is the Debate Still Alive? 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 299 (2005).

7.9.9 Developments in Eastern Europe and Russia

8. Computers and Legal Reasoning

8.0 General

Caroline Bradley & A. Michael Froomkin, Institute for Information Law and Policy Symposium State of Play: II. Article: Virtual Worlds, Real Rules, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 103 (2004-2005).

James Grimmelmann, Virtual Worlds as Comparative Law, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 147 (2004-2005).

David R. Johnson, How Online Games May Change the Law and Legally Significant Institutions, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 51 (2004-2004).

Juliet M. Moringiello, Signals, Assent and Internet Contracting, 57 RUTGERS L. REV. 1307 (2005).

Cory Ondrejka, Escaping the Gilded Cage: User Created Content and Building the Metaverse, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 81 (2004-2005).

Molly Torsen, The Domination of the English Language in the Global Village: Efforts to Further Develop the Internet by Populating It with Non Latin-Based Languages, 12 RICH. J.L. & TECH. 1 (2005).

8.1 Artificial Intelligence

9. Legal Issues of the Internet

9.0 General

Andrew Adams, Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 289 (2005) (reviewing R. SPINELLO, CYBERETHICS: MORALITY AND LAW IN CYBERSPACE (2d ed. 2003)).

Jeffrey Allen, Making Technology Work for You: Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? EXPERIENCE, Summer 2005, at 39.

Dr. Richard A. Bartle, Virtual Worldliness." What the Imaginary Asks of the Real, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 19 (2004-2005).

David T. Bower, Make It Stop or I'll Sue!: The Feasibility of a Hostile Work Environment Claim Created by Sexually Explicit Spam, 90 IOWA L. REV. 1577 (2005).

Dan L. Burk, Law as a Network Standard, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 1 (2005).

Eric B. Chamberlain & Roland C. Goss, Derek J. Lisk, Hilary N. Rowen, Jonathan E. Swartz & Aaron Louis Walter, Recent Developments in Internet Law, 40 TORT & INS. L.J. 621 (2005).

James R. Davis, II, How to Prevent and If Necessary, Respond to a Phishing Attack, INTELL. PROP. L. NEWSL., 44 (2005).

Jeremy Delibero, Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels and the Webcasting Controversy: The Antithesis of Good Alternative Dispute Resolution, 5 PEPP. DISP. RESOL. L.J. 83 (2005).

J. Heath Dixon, Privacy Laws and Doing Business Online, 17 NO. 2 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L.J. 11 (2005).

Karol Dobrzeniecki, How Should We Deal with Human Rights in Cyberspace? Some Remarks, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 253 (2005).

Michael Dockins, Internet Links: The Good, The Bad, The Tortious, and a Two-Part Test, 36 U. TOL. L. REV. 367 (2005).

Christoph Engel, Governing the Egalitarian Core of the Internet, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 6 (2005).

Courtney W. Franks, Analyzing the Urge to Merge: Conversion of Intangible Property and the Merger Doctrine in the Wake of Kremen v. Cohen, 42 HOUS. L. REV. 489 (2005).

Henning Hartwig, Online Auctioning Between Trademark and Consumer Protection, 27 EUR. INTELL. PROP. REV. 319 (2005).

Jerry Kang and Dana Cuff, Pervasive Computing: Embedding the Public Sphere, 62 WASH & LEE L. REV. 93 (2005).

Mark S. Kende, Filtering out Children: The First Amendment and Internet Porn in the U.S. Supreme Court, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 843 (2005).

Zack Kertcher & Ainat N. Margalit, Challenges to Authority, Burden of Legitimisation: The Printing Press and the Internet, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. POL'Y 3 (2005).

Jay P. Kesan, Andres A. Gallo, The Market for Private Dispute Resolution Services--An Empirical Re-Assessment of ICANN-UDRP Performance, 11 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 285 (Spring 2005).

Jay P. Kesan, Rajiv C. Shah, Shaping Code, 18 HARV. J. LAW & TEC. 319 (2005).

Ian Kilbey, Consumer Protection Evaded Via the Internet, 30 EUR. L. REV. 123 (2005).

Arno R. Lodder, John Zeleznikow, Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model, 10 Harv. Negotiation L. Rev. 287 (2005).

Joseph V. Marra, Note, Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape Communications Corp.: Making Confusion a Requirement for Online Initial Interest Confusion, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 209 (2005).

Milo Molfa, US Legislation on Cross-Border Gambling Violates the GA TS: Has a New Era for Internet Gambling Commenced? I Would Not Bet on/t, 11 INT'L TRADE L. & REG. 205 (2005).

Sue Ann Mota, Protecting Minors From Sexually Explicit Material on the Net: COPA Likely Violates the First Amendment According to the Supreme Court, 7 TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 95 (2005).

Jens U. Nebel, Med's Position Paper on Digital Technology and the Copyright Act: Legislation without a Solution? 36 VUWLR 45, (2005).

Beth Simone Noveck, Institute for Information Law and Policy Symposium State of Play: Introduction: The State of Play, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 1 (2004-2005).

Maz Saul Oppenheimer, Yours for Keeps: MGM v. Grokster, 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 209 (2005).

Alejandro Lopez Ortiz, Arbitration and IT, 21 ARB. INT'L. 343 (2005).

Mario J.A. Oyarzabal, Jurisdiction over International Electronic Contracts: A view on Inter-American, Mercosur, and Argentine Rules, 19 TEMP. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 87 (2005).

Balazs Ratai, Understanding Lessig: Implications for European Union Cyberspace Policy, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 277 (2005).

Katherine Raynolds, Note, One Verizon, Two Verizon, Three Verizon, More?--A Comment: RIAA v. Verizon and How the DMCA Subpoena Power Became Powerless, 23 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 343 (2005).

Douglas Rushkoff, The New Alphabet, 49 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 45 (2004-2005).

Michael L. Rustad, Foreword to the Thomas F. Lambert, Jr., Symposium Issue on Sophisticated Tort Theories, 5 J. High Tech. L. 1 (2005).

Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig, Harmonizing Cybertort Law for Europe and America, 5 J. High Tech. L. 13 (2005).

Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig, Rebooting Cybertort Law, 80 WASH. L. REV. 335, May 2005.

Alexander Shytov, Indecency on the Internet and International Law, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 260 (2005).

Curtis Summers, Porn Impacts the Spending Power? The Children's Internet Protection Act and Dole's Need for Practical "Bite," 53 KAN. L. REV. 509 (2005).

Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, Characteristics Making Internet Communication Challenge Traditional Models of Regulation--What Every International Jurist Should Know about the Internet, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 39 (2005).

Ryan P. Wallace, Adam M. Lusthaus & Jong Hwan (Justin) Kim, Computer Crimes, 42 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 223 (2005).

Kim Weatherall, Internet Cultures--Not an Oxymoron, 27 SYDNEY L. REV. 753 (2005) (reviewing KATHY BOWERY, LAW AN INTERNET CULTURES (2005)).

Charles Wild, Stuart Weinstein & Christine Riefa, Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts: Some Thoughts on Article 15 and the Futility of Applying "In the Box" Conflict of Law Rules to the 'Out of the Box' Borderless World, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 13 (2005).

Lily Zhang, The CAN-SPAM Act: An Insufficient Response to the Growing Spam Problem, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 301 (2005).

9.1 ISP and Internet Access

Steven Aronowitz, Brand X Internet Services v. FCC: The Case of the Missing Policy Argument, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 887 (2005).

Emily K. Fritts, Internet Libel and the Communications Decency Act: How the Courts Erroneously Interpreted Congressional Intent with Regard to Liability of Internet Service Providers, 93 KY. L.J. 765 (2005).

Aaron Jacobson, United States v. American Library Association: Software Filters, Free Speech, and the Shrinking Public Forum, 38 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 1345 (2005).

Michael L. Rustad & Thomas H. Koenig, Rebooting Cybertort Law, 80 WASH. L. REV. 335 (2005).

Yohei Sude, Monitoring E-Mail Of Employees In The Private Sector: A Comparison Between Western Europe And The United States, 4 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 209 (2005).

Laurence H. Winer, The Old Order Changeth, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 333 (2005) (reviewing MONROE E. PRICE, MEDIA AND SOVERIGNTY (2002)).

9.2 Domain Names

Grace Chan, Domain Name Protection in Hong Kong: Flaws and Proposals for Reform, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 206 (2005).

W. Scott Creasman, Free Speech and "Sucking"--When is the Use of a Trademark in a Domain Name Fair? 95 TRADEMARK REP. 1034 (2005).

Swati Deva, What's in a Name? Disputes Relating to Domain Names in India, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 165 (2005).

Richard A. Epstein, The Roman Law of Cyberconversion, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 103.

J. Ryan Gilfoil, A Judicial Safe Harbor Under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 185 (2005).

H. Brian Holland, Tempest in A Teapot Or Tidal Wave? Cybersquatting Rights and Remedies Run Amok, 10 J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 301 (2005).

David M. Kelly, "Trademark.com" Domain Names-Must They Communicate the Website's Protected Content to Avoid Trademark Liability? 33 AIPLA Q.J. 397 (2005).

Dirk Kocher, Report, Liberalization of Finnish Domain Name Law, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 336 (2005).

Konstantinos Komaitis, Pandora's Box Is Finally Opened." The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Process and Arbitration, 19 INT'L REV. L. COMPUTERS & TECH. 99 (2005).

Michael Kwon, Filtering the Smoke out of Cigarette Websites: A Technological Solution to Enforcing Judgments Against Offshore Websites, 30 BROOK. J. INT'L L. 1067 (2005).

Jacqueline D. Lipton, Beyond Cybersquatting: Taking Domain Name Disputes Past Trademark Policy, 40 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 1361 (2005).

Lawrence V. Molnar, Who Owns "invisible.com", and "whois" Disappearing? A Practitioner Looks for Answers, 48 RES GESTAE 26 (2005).

Robert W. Sacoff, Consumer's View of UDRP Actions, INTELL. PROP. L. NEWSL., Spring 2005, at 20.

Joseph J. Weissman, The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act: Developments Through Its First Six Years, 95 TRADEMARK REP. 1058 (2005).

9.3 Taxation of Electronic Commerce

Barrett Brooks, E-Commerce and State Sales Tax, 24 J. ST. TAX'N 47 (2005).

Susan K. Duke, E-Commerce and the Taxation Doctrine of Permanent Establishment in the United States and China, 14 FLA. ST. J. TRANSNAT'L L. & POL'Y 275 (2005).

Robert Feinschreiber & Margaret Kent, E-Commerce and Foreign Retail Distribution, 16 J. INT'L TAX'N 30 (2005).

Alexander Peukert, A Bipolar Copyright System for the Digital Network Environment, 28 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 1 (2005).

Dale Pinto, 'Conservative' and 'Radical' Alternatives for Taxing E-Commerce (Part I), 16 J. INT'L TAX'N 14 (2005).

Andrew W. Swain, & Nathaniel T. Trelease, Taxing Time for the Internet? BUS. L. TODAY, Nov.-Dec. 2005, at 11.

9.4 Encryption and Digital Signatures

Lori B. Andrews, Harnessing the Benefits of Biobanks, 33 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 22 (2005).

Lyombe Eko & Natasha Tolstikova, To Sign or Not to Sign on the Electronic Dotted Line. The United States, the Russian Federation, and International Electronic Signature Policy, 10 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 5 (2005).

Aaron Perkins, Comment, Encryption Use: Law and Anarchy on the Digital Frontier, 41 HOUS. L. REV. 1625 (2005).

Aashish Srivastava, No Rice, No Wife to Cook: An Analysis of the Electronic Signatures Law of China, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 437 (2005).

9.5 Internet Crime

Iowa Unit Trains Police to Find Web Predators, 33 JUV. JUST. DIG. 2 (2005).

New Jersey Creates Computer Crime Unit, 33 JUV. JUST. DIG. 3 (2005).

Pennsylvania: New Website Lists Every Sex Offender, 33 JUV. JUST. DIG. 7 (2005).

Website Features Data on Domestic Violence, 33 JUV. JUST. DIG. 2 (2005).

Richard Bernstein, Must The Children Be Sacrificed." The Tension Between Emerging Imaging Technology, Free Speech and Protecting Children, 31 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 406 (2005).

Christopher D. Van Blarcum, Internet Hate Speech: The European Framework and the Emerging American Haven, 62 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 781 (2005).

Alan F. Blakley, Daniel B. Garrie, & Matthew J. Armstrong, Coddling Spies: Why the Law Doesn't Adequately Address Computer Spyware, 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 25.

Susan W. Brenner, Distributed Security." Moving Away from Reactive Law Enforcement, 9 INT'L J. COMM. L. & POL'Y 11 (2005).

Susan W. Brenner, Toward a Criminal Law for Cyberspace: Product Liability and Other Issues, 8 PITTSBURGH J. TECH. L. & POL'Y 1 (2005).

Edward Carter, Outlaw Speech on the Internet: Examining the Link Between Unique Characteristics of Online Media and Criminal Libel Prosecutions, 21 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. 289 (2005).

Suna Chang, The Prodigal "Son" Returns: An Assessment of Current "Son of Sam" Laws and the Reality of the Online Murderabilia Marketplace, 31 RUTGERS COMPUTER & TECH. L.J. 430 (2005).

Anne Flanagan, Law and Computer Crime: Reading the Script of Reform, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 98 (2005).

Megan E. Frese, Rolling the Dice: Are Online Gambling Advertisers "Aiding and Abetting" Criminal Activity or Exercising First Amendment-Protected Commercial Speech? 15 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 547 (2005).

Mary J. Hildebrand & Jacqueline Klosek, Recent Security Breaches Highlight the Important Role of Data Security in Privacy Compliance Programs, 17 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L.J. 20 (2005).

Beryl A. Howell, Real Worm Problems of Virtual Crime, 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 103 (2005).

Curtis E. A. Karnow, Launch On Warning: Aggressive Defense of Computer Systems, 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 87 (2005).

Michael D. Lane, Spies Among Us: Can New Legislation Stop Spyware from Bugging Your Computer? 17 LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 283 (2005).

John W. Lomas, New Jersey's Internet Luring Statute: An Appropriate Next Step? 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 16 (2005).

Jennifer Lynch, Identity Theft in Cyberspace: Crime Control Methods and Their Effectiveness in Combating Phishing Attacks, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 259 (2005).

Ronald J. Mann & Seth R. Belzley, The Promise Of Internet Intermediary Liability, 47 WM. & MARY L. REV. 239 (2005).

Katherine Miltner, Discriminatory Filtering: CIPA's Effect on Our Nation's Youth and Why the Supreme Court Erred in Upholding the Constitutionality of The Children's Internet Protection Act, 57 FED. COMM. L.J. 555 (2005).

Chinn Pann, The Dormant Commerce Clause and State Regulation of the Internet: Are Laws Protecting Minors from Sexual Predators Constitutionally Different than those Protecting Minors from Sexually Explicit Materials? 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 8 (2005).

John D. Podesta & Raj Goyle, Lost in Cyberspace? Finding American Liberties in a Dangerous Digital World, 23 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 509 (2005).

Dru Stevenson, Entrapment by Numbers, 16 J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 1 (2005).

Robert Louis B. Stevenson, Plugging the "Phishing" Hole: Legislation versus Technology, 2005 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. 6 (2005).

Michael J. Tonsing, Another Warning About "Phishing, '" FED. LAW., Feb. 2005, at 14.

9.6 Civil Procedure in Cyberspace

Thomas Y. Allman, Proposed Natinal E-Discover Standards and the Sedona Principles, 72 DEF. COUNS. J. 47 (2005).

John M. Barkett, E-Discovery Help May Be On the Way ... Sort of: Civil Rules, Advisory Committee Proposal, 72 DEF. COUNS. J. 37 (2005).

Oren Bigos, Jurisdiction over Cross-Border Wrongs on the Internet, 54 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 585 (2005).

Shawn A. Bone, Private Harms in the Cyber-World: The Conundrum of Choice of Law for Defamation Posed, Gutnick v. Dow, Jones & Co., 62 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 279 (2005).

David Gorski, Future of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Subpoena Power on the Internet in Light of the Verizon Cases, 24 REV. LITIG. 149 (2005).

Mohammad Iqbal, New Paradigms of E-Discover and Cost-Shifting: Determing Who Pays for Electronic Discovery, 72 DEF. COUNS. J. 283 (2005).

Lora M. Jennings, Finding Legal Certainty for E-Commerce: Traditional Personal Jurisdiction Analysis and the Scope of the Zippo Sliding Scale, 44 WASHBURN L.J. 381 (2005).

Orin S. Kerr, Essay, Digital Evidence and the New Criminal Procedure, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 279 (2005).

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., Defamation in the Digital Age: Some Comparative Law Observations on the Difficulty of Reconciling Free Speech and Reputation in the Emerging Global Village, 62 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 339 (2005).

Tim Gerlach, Note And Comment: Using Internet Content Filters To Create E-Borders To Aid In International Choice Of Law And Jurisdiction, 26 WHITTIER L. REV. 899 (2005).

Miriam F. Miquelon-Weismann, The Convention on Cybercrime: A Harmonized Implementation of International Penal Law: What Prospects for Procedural Due Process? 23 J. MARSHALL J. COMPUTER & INFO. L. 329 (2005).

Kristin M. Nimsger & Michele C.S. Lange, E Is for Evidence: Examining Recent E-Discovery Developments, A.B.A. SCITECH LAW., Winter 2005 at 8.

Dawn C. Nunziato, The Death of the Public Forum in Cyberspace, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1115 (2005).

George L. Paul & Robert F. Copple, Dealing with Data: No, You Can't Call Them Documents Anymore, BUS. L. TODAY, Mar.-Apr. 2005, at 35.

Matthew R. Schreck, Preventing "You've Got Mail" [TM] From Meaning "You've Been Served." How Service of Process by E-Mail Does Not Meet Constitutional Procedural Due Process Requirements, 38 J. MARSHALL L. REV. 1121 (2005).

Nicolai Seitz, Transborder Search: A New Perspective in Law Enforcement? 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 23 (2005).

Daniel J. Steinbock, Data Matching, Data Mining and Due Process, 40 GA. L. REV. 1 (2005).

Scot M. Graydon, Jurisdiction Issues in Cybercrime, 59 CONSUMER FIN. L.Q. REP. 99 (2005)

9.7 Jurisdictional problems in cybercrime

Gregg L. Weiner, e-Discovery: It's Getting Scary out There, BUS. L. TODAY, Mar.-Apr. 2005, at 11.

Dennis T. Yokoyama, You Can't Always Use the Zippo Code: The Fallacy of a Uniform Theory of Internet Personal Jurisdiction, 54 DEPAUL L. REV. 1147 (2005).

10. Law and Technology

10.0 General

Michael Greenberger, The 800 Pound Gorilla Sleeps: The Federal Government's Lackadaisical Liability and Compensation Policies in the Context of Pre-Event Vaccine Immunization Programs, 8 J. HEALTH CARE L. & POL'Y 7 (2005).

Kari L. Higbee, Comment, Student Privacy Rights: Drug Testing and Fourth Amendment Protections, 41 IDAHO L. REV. 361 (2005).

Meir S. Hornung, Think Before You Type: A Look at Email Privacy in the Workplace, 11 FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 115 (2005).

Leslie Gielow Jacobs, A Troubling Equation in Contracts for Government Funded Scientific Research: "Sensitive But Unclassified" = Secret But Unconstitutional, 1 J. NAT'L SECURITY L. & POL'Y 113 (2005).

Orin S. Kerr, Congress, The Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove, 74 FORDHAM L. REV. 779 (2005).

Declan McCullagh & Milani Homsi, Leave DRM Alone: A Survey of Legislative Proposals Relating to Digital Rights Management Technology and Their Problems, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 317 (2005).

Courtney Lytle Perry, My Kingdom for a Horse: Reining in Runaway Legislation from Software to Spam, 11 TEX. WESLEYAN L. REV. 523 (2005).

Ted Sabety, Nanotechnology Innovation And The Patent Thicket: Which IP Policies Promote Growth? 15 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 477 (2005).

K. A. Taipale, Technology, Security and Privacy: The Fear Of Frankenstein, The Mythology Of Privacy and The Lessons Of King Ludd, 7 YALE J. L. & TECH. 123 (2005).

James J. Tracy, Browsewrap Agreements: Register. Com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc., 11 B.U.J. SCI. & TECH. L. 164 (2005).

Prodromos Tsiavos, Between Revolution and Governance: A Review of Xiudian Dai's the Digital Revolution and Governance, 13 INT'L J.L. & INFO. TECH. 281 (2005).

10.1 Technology Transfer

Markus Feil, New Block Exemption Regulation on Technology Transfer Agreements in the Light of the U.S. Antitrust Regime on the Licensing of Intellectual Property, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 31 (2005).

Bill Hennessey, Changing Traffic Patterns in Technospace, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 201 (2005).

Inger B. Orstavik, Technology Transfer Agreements: Grant-Backs and No-Challenge Clauses in the New EC Technology Transfer Regulation, 36 INT'L REV. INTELL. PROP. & COMPETITION L. 83 (2005).

Keith E. Maskus, Using the International Trading System to Foster Technology Transfer for Economic Development, 2005 MICH. ST. L. REV. 219 (2005).

10.2 Audio/Video Recording

Clay Calvert, Victories for Privacy and Losses for Journalism? Five Privacy Controversies from 2004 and their Policy Implications for the Future of Reportage, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 649 (2005).

Daniel Castro, Cleveland v. Viacom, Inc.: Implications for the Dissemination of Movies in a Digitally Networked World, 20 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 765 (2005).

Micheal Clements, Virtually Free from Punishment Until Proven Guilty: The Internet, Web Cameras and the Compelling Necessity Standard, 12 RICH J.L. & TECH. 1 (2005).

Derek T. Conom, Comment, Sense-enhancing Technology and the Search in the Wake of Kyllo v. United States: Will Prevalence Kill Privacy? 41 WILLAMETTE L. REV. 749 (2005).

10.3 Space Law

Steven Freeland, Up, Up and ... Back: The Emergence of Space Tourism and Its Impact on the International Law of Outer Space, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 1 (2005).

Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, The Perils of Landsat from Grassroots to Globalization: A Comprehensive Review of US Remote Sensing Law with a Few Thoughts for the Future, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 45 (2005).

Henry R. Hertzfeld and Frans G. vonder Dunk, Bringing Space Law into the Commercial World: Property Rights without Sovereignty, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 81 (2005).

Molly K. Macauley, Flying in the Face of Uncertainty: Human Risk in Space Activities, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 131 (2005).

Steven A. Mirmina and David J. Den Herder, Nuclear Power Sources and Future Space Exploration, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 149 (2005).

Paul G. Pastorek, The Hubble Servicing Mission Controversy: Is the Risk of a Manned Mission Reasonable? 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 101 (2005).

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, International Space Law in Transformation: Some Observations, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 69 (2005).

Rosanna Sattler, Transporting a Legal System for Property Rights: From the Earth to the Stars, 6 CHI. J. INT'L L. 23 (2005).

10.4 Medical Technology

Elizabeth A. Ackmann, Prenatal Testing Gone Awry: The Birth of a Conflict of Ethics and Liability, 2 IND. HEALTH L. REV. 199 (2005).

Andrew Askland, Introduction: The Rise and Flourishing of Gene Databanks, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 111 (2005).

Melissa A. Austin, Julia Crouch & Alyssa DiGiacomo, Applying International Guidelines on Ethical Legal and Social Issues to New International Genebanks, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 115 (2005).

K. Berger, Protecting the Unborn Clone: Can Law and Science Evolve Together, 24 MED. & LAW 561 (2005).

Margaret A. Berger, Science for Judges IV Introduction, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 499 (2005).

David A. Butler, Connections: The Early History of Scientific and Medical Research on "Agent Orange," 13 J.L. & POL'Y 527 (2005).

Angela Campbell, Ethos and Economics: Examining the Rationale Underlying Stem Cell and Cloning Research Policies in the United States, Germany, and Japan, 31 AM. J.L. & MED. 47 (2005).

Adrienne N. Calhoun Cash, Invasion of the Clones: Animal Cloning and the Potential Implications on the Future of Human Cloning and Cloning Legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Internationally, 82 U. DET. MERCY L. REV. 349, (2005).

Ellen Wright Clayton, Informed Consent and Biobanks, 33 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 15 (2005).

Emilie W. Clemmens, Creating Human Embryos for Research: A Scientist's Perspective on Managing the Legal and Ethical Issues, 2 IND. HEALTH L. REV. 95 (2005).

Michael Clisham, Reviews in Medical Ethics: Refining Humanity: A Review of the Coevolution of Human Potential and Converging Technologies, 33 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 380 (2005).

A. Conti & P. Delbon, Medically-Assisted Procreation in Italy, 24 MED. & LAW 163 (2005).

Ronald Cranford, Facts, Lies, and Videotapes: The Permanent Vegetative State and the Sad Case of Terri Schiavo, 33 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 363 (2005).

Mylene Deschenes & Clementine Sallee, Accountability in Population Biobanking: Comparative Approaches, 33 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 54 (2005).

Nanette Lister, Future Uses of Residual Newborn Blood Spots: Legal and Ethical Considerations, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 179 (2005).

Joseph Russell Falasco, Frozen Embryos and Gamete Providers' Rights: A Suggested Model for Embryo Disposition, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 273 (2005).

Michele Goodwin, Assisted Reproductive Technology and The Double Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood, 9 J. GENDER RACE & JUST. 1 (2005).

Richard Guerra, States Take the Initiative to Regulate and Resolve the Stem Cell Debate, 7 FL. COASTAL L.J. 35 (2005).

Darren Handler, An Island of Chaos Surrounded by a Sea of Confusion: The E911 Wireless Device Location Initiative, 10 VA. J.L. & TECH. 1 (2005).

Ray K. Harris and Susan Stone Rosenfield, Copyright Protection for Genetic Databases, 45 JURIMETRICS J. 225 (2005).

Rhonda Gay Hartman, Face Value: Challenges of Transplant Technology, 31 AM. J.L. & MED. 7 (2005).

Ingrid H. Heide, Negligence in the Creation of Healthy Babies: Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Cases of Alternative Reproductive Technology Malpractice Without Physical Injury, 9 MICH. ST. J. MED. & L. 55 (2005).

Tamara K. Hervey & Haft Black, The European Union and the Governance of Stem Cell Research, 12 MAASTRICHT J. EUR. & COMP. LAW 1 (2005).

Irva Hertz-Picciotto, How Scientists View Causality and Assess Evidence: A Study of the Institute of Medicine's Evaluation of Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans and Agent Orange, 13 J.L. & POL'Y 553 (2005).

Edward J.