Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com
 

Creating and using hybrid entities.

By Benson, David
Publication: The Tax Adviser
Date: Sunday, August 1 1999

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

* For Federal tax purposes, taxpayers may elect to treat a foreign business entity as either a corporation or as a flowthrough entity, regardless of the foreign country's classification, if the entity type is not on the per se list.

* A "hybrid" is a foreign

entity taxable as a corporation in its country of incorporation that chooses to be treated as a partnership or a branch for Federal tax purposes.

* Before recommending hybridization through a branch election for an eligible SME, a careful analysis of all potentially applicable Code provisions must be undertaken.

Flexibility in international tax planning may be accomplished by the use of a foreign entity that is a corporation in its country of origin, but has the ability to check the box and elect its classification under Federal tax rules. This article presents a primer on establishing and planning for the use of such "hybrid" entities.

Final entity classification regulations--the "check-the-box" (CTB) rules issued in December 1996(1)--allow taxpayers to elect to treat most business entities (including foreign business entities) for Federal tax purposes as corporations, partnerships or (if the entity has one member) disregarded entities. While specified foreign business entities are excluded from the elective system and are treated per se as corporations, they are generally limited to publicly traded-type entities (e.g., U.K. PLCs, German AGs and French SAs; a list is contained in Regs. Sec. 301.7701-2(b)(8)). Despite the apparent restrictions imposed by the per se list, typically, at least one entity in any given country is viewed as a corporation under local law, but is eligible to check the box (e.g., the U.K. Limited Company, German GmbH and French SARL). Further, Regs. Sec. 301.7701-2(d)(1) grandfathered certain business entities on the per se list in existence on May 8, 1996, allowing them to retain their previous partnership or branch status. The CTB elective regime replaced the former four-factor approach under Regs. Sec. 301.7701-2 for classifying entities, which was cumbersome to apply and sometimes generated uncertainties, particularly for foreign entities.

The final CTB regulations ushered in a new era of flexibility in international tax planning for U.S. persons. However, IRS actions since the issuance of the final CTB regulations have eroded some of the rules' flexibility. This article will discuss establishing a foreign hybrid under the new CTB regime and planning opportunities.

In addition, make sure to read these articles:

  • Metavante: Bad Economy Squeezes Business Owners at...
  • Business Editors REPEATING...adding Metavante to headline MILWAUKEE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 5, 2002 With year-end tax planning now in full swing, business owners are looking for ways to ......
  • Research And Markets: Study This Comprehensive...
  • DUBLIN, Ireland -- This guide to global taxation is written by decision-makers from international law and consultancy firms who provide expert advice on the ......
  • ADVISORY/Federal Surplus Shrinking.
  • Business Editors ADVISORY... --(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 27, 2001 TOPIC: USAToday quotes a revised Congressional Budget Office estimate that says that the new tax cut, as well ......
  • Rev. Rul. 2004-59
  • Section 708.-Continuation of Partnership 26 CFR 1.708-1: Continuation of a partnership. (Also: 7701, 301.7701-1, 301.7701-2, 301.7701-3.) State law conversion from partnership to corporation. This ruling ......
  • New guidance on classifying qualified entities.
  • Tax Assistance Practice, San Diego A qualified entity is a business entity that is wholly owned by a husband and wife as community property under ......
  • Rev. Rul. 2002-55
  • ISSUE How the 85 percent member income test of (sec)501(c)(12)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code is applied in the situation described below. FACTS A is ......
  • Rev. Rul. 2006-3
  • Section 7701.-Definitions 26 CFR 301.7701-2: Business entities; definitions. Japanese Yugen Kaisha (YK) and Tokurei Yugen Kaisha (TYK). A Yugen Kaisha, a Japanese business entity, which ......
  • QSubs Recognized as Separate Entities
  • The IRS has issued final regulations that treat qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (QSubs) and other disregarded entities (DEs) as separate entities for federal employment tax ......
  • T.D. 9246
  • DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 Clarification of Definitions AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations. SUMMARY: This ......
  • Check-the-box: choosing an entity's...
  • The Internal Revenue Service has finalized rules that allow most businesses to choose whether they will be treated as a corporation or as a passthrough ......
  • Attribution rules applicable to commercial...
  • Until recently, a foreign person subject to tax in the United States was required to consider the U.S. related party rules only in a fairly ......
  • "Check the box" final regulations explained.
  • Before the final regulations were passed effective January 1st, 1997, IRS used four factors to determine if an entity such as Partnership, LLC, or LLP ......
  • State tax pitfalls for LLCs.
  • Since January 1997, when the Federal "check-the-box" regulations went into effect, limited liability companies (LLCs) have proliferated, allowing newly formed LLCs to elect their Federal ......
  • Certain mergers involving disregarded entities...
  • On Nov. 15, 2001, the IRS issued Prop. Regs. Sec. 1,368-2(b)(1), allowing certain mergers involving disregarded entities to qualify as A reorganizations and partially reversing ......
  • Rev. Rul. 2004-77
  • ISSUE How is an eligible entity (as defined in 301.7701-3(a) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations) classified for federal tax purposes if the entity has ......