Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com

Dos and Don'ts of Construction Contracts

By Diana, Tom,Fullerton, Jim
Publication: Northeast Pennsylvania Business Journal
Date: Thursday, March 1 2007

Credit managers of businesses, especially suppliers, involved in construction projects recieved a lot of valuable advice from James D. Fullerton, Esq. about how to structure contracts and credit applications during a recent NACM teleconference. As an attorney and president of the law firm of Fullerton

& Knowles, PC, licensed in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia, he has acquired considerable knowledge in the field of construction law. His firm represents suppliers, subcontractors, design professionals and other members of the real estate and construction industries.

Fullerton said that when doing business related to a construction project, it is essential to be fully protected by a well-written contract. However, he mentioned that it still doesn't guarantee that problems will not be encountered. "Contracts are not going to solve all the problems and they're not going to prevent problems. Contract terms are about costs, terms and risks," Fullerton added. "You want to be sure you are one of the first people paid off if there are problems."

One provision that Fullerton recommended putting in sales contracts is one that allows for the payment of a sellers attorneys' fees if there is a late or nonpayment by the debtor. "Just having an attorneys' fees provision will make it more likely they will pay you rather than some other creditor." Another important provision in a contract is a trust fund agreement. In such an agreement, Fullerton said the customer agrees that all funds owed to the customer from anyone or received by the customer, to the extent those funds result from the labor or materials supplied by seller, shall be held in trust for the benefit of seller only. These funds are, therefore, held in trust for their beneficiary, which is the seller. And, pointing to another benefit of trust fund agreements Fullerton said, "It's a terrific defense of a preference case."

Another contract provision recommended is the right to verify funding. This gives the seller the right and opportunity to verify credit and funding before the obligation to ship the products. Fullerton also recommended including a provision in a contract that requires reimbursement of the seller in the event goods have to be stored for a period of time because of construction delays. "It is important to state a storage fee if you have to store goods before delivery. It's very hard to collect any storage fee if the buyer hasn't agreed to it."

Various provisions to limit damages were explained, such as including a contract provision that would limit the amount of damages to an amount equal to the price of the products delivered. He described a situation he encountered where a supplier sued for the value of products delivered to a construction project, which was $1.5 million. The supplier was counter-sued by the project owner for $3 million for damages related to the products allegedly being defective. However, because the supplier had contract provisions that limited liability to the value of the products and also had a contract provision that included reimbursement of legal fees, the project owner then sued the manufacturer of the products instead. "We got our money within 90 days and got out of litigation. That's what limitation of liability clauses will do for you."

SIDEBAR

Defense of Payment for Sureties on Public Projects in Pennsylvania

Contractors do not have mechanic's lien rights on public projects. The federal Miller Act and various state "Little" Miller Acts were created to protect subcontractors and suppliers on public projects by requiring that the general contractor provide a payment bond. An unpaid subcontractor or supplier can look to the general contractor and/or its bonding company for payment if the subcontractor or supplier's customer does not pay them.

Most Miller Acts have no "defense of payment." A general contractor can be forced to pay a sub-subcontractor or a supplier to a subcontractor, even if the general contractor owes no money to the subcontractor. This is not the case in Pennsylvania. There is a "defense of payment" in Pennsylvania's Little Miller Act. Sub-subcontractors and suppliers to subcontractors will not be able to force payment on a bond if the general contractor has already paid its subcontractor, even if there were no problems with labor and/or materials provided.

This substantially adds to the risk in supplying tabor and materials to public projects in Pennsylvania. Suppliers on public projects must carefully evaluate the creditworthiness of their customers and notify general contractors early of signs of trouble. This early notification may keep the general contractor from paying its subcontractor or may lead to a joint payment arrangement.

By Jim Fullerton, Esq., Fullerton & Knowles

IMAGE PHOTOGRAPH1

Tom Diana

AUTHOR_AFFILIATION

Tom Diana may be reached via email at tomd@nacm.org.

In addition, make sure to read these articles: