A U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was within its authority to reject a petition from anti-growth groups calling for the regulation of so-called "greenhouse gasses" from new motor vehicles. The American Road & Transportation Builders Association
If enacted, any new regulations would likely have resulted in increased prices for motor vehicles and construction equipment as well as restrictive standards which, if not met, could place states and localities in jeopardy of losing federal transportation funding.
At issue was a 1999 petition filed by a number of environmental organizations seeking to compel the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicle engines. In September 2003, the EPA denied the petition based on a thorough review of the Clean Air Act, stating that it "can not and should not" regulate "greenhouse gas" emissions. The coalition of environmental groups which originally brought the petition appealed the EPA's decision to the Court of Appeals.
The July 15 ruling was particularly significant because it is the highest federal court to speak to the issue of greenhouse gas regulation. The court ruled EPA is not required to regulate greenhouse gasses under the Clean Air Act. The decision also noted there is "scientific uncertainty" on the issue of climate change.