"The decision to terminate an individual´s employment carries with it the risk of a possible legal challenge. Depending upon an employer´s policies or whether an employee has an employment contract, an employee may, for example, have a breach of contract or "wrongful discharge" claim.
An "at-will" employer - that is, an employer who reserves the right to terminate employees without cause - generally does not need to worry about such claims. Like all other employers, however, an at-will employer still must be concerned about many other possible claims [such as]...discrimination, making false, disparaging comments about them to coworkers or other parties; treated them in a manner intended to cause emotional distress; invaded their privacy by improperly disclosing the reason for an involuntary termination; or terminated them in retaliation for exercising a legal right, such as reporting discriminatory or other unlawful employment practices or taking a leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act or the Military Leave Act....
An employer can reduce the likelihood of a challenge in a number of ways [such as] Ensure that post-termination procedures are followed....Be candid with the employee...Respect the employee´s feelings...Respect the employee´s privacy...Obtain a release...Avoid inconsistent post-termination statements...Maintain relevant documents...Consider providing outplacement services.."
Read more in this About.com artilce.
Problem: An employee has a valid fifteen year contract and new Trustees did not extend the contract but gave a new one in its place without mentioning the newest one supersedes the first one. Do the newer Trustees hold the first one valid as the second does not mention it is a superseding contract. What is the law in the case?
Comment By: francis donofrio | 7/6/06 at 12:00 PM How to Fire an EmployeeProblem: An employee has a valid fifteen year contract and new Trustees did not extend the contract but gave a new one in its place without mentioning the newest one supersedes the first one. Do the newer Trustees hold the first one valid as the second does not mention it is a superseding contract. What is the law in the case?
Comment By: francis donofrio | 7/6/06 at 12:00 PM How to Fire an EmployeeProblem: An employee has a valid fifteen year contract and new Trustees did not extend the contract but gave a new one in its place without mentioning the newest one supersedes the first one. Do the newer Trustees hold the first one valid as the second does not mention it is a superseding contract. What is the law in the case?
Comment By: francis donofrio | 7/6/06 at 12:00 PM How to Fire an EmployeeProblem: An employee has a valid fifteen year contract and new Trustees did not extend the contract but gave a new one in its place without mentioning the newest one supersedes the first one. Do the newer Trustees hold the first one valid as the second does not mention it is a superseding contract. What is the law in the case?
Comment By: francis donofrio | 7/6/06 at 12:00 PM How to Fire an Employee