Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com
 

Toward A New Federalism in State Civil Justice: Developing a Uniform Code of State Civil Procedure Through a Collaborative Rule-Making Process

By Koppel, Glenn S
Publication: Vanderbilt Law Review
Date: Sunday, May 1 2005
HEADNOTE

The federal rules of civil procedure were intended by their drafters to be a model for states to adopt, thereby promoting national procedural uniformity. From 1949 through 1975, federal procedure exerted a powerful influence

over state civil procedure as the number of "replica" states grew from four to twenty-three. The golden age of the federal rules is over. The initiative in procedural reform has passed to the states, which have been increasingly assertive in adopting rules that deviate from the federal model, particularly in the area of discovery.

This Article proposes that the next great wave of procedural reform in American civil justice emanate from the states themselves in the form of a national code of state civil procedure. The willingness of states to chart their own paths toward civil justice reform presents both a problem and an opportunity. The problem-especially for parties who litigate on a national scale-is a crazy quilt of procedures that promote forum shopping, which can unfairly affect substantive outcomes. The ferment of experimentation among state jurisdictions, however, also presents an opportunity-the chance to produce a better national civil procedure than the Federal Rules now afford and to create a collaborative state rule-making process, grounded in a system of controlled rules experimentation, which may serve as a model for federal rule-makers.

In addition, make sure to read these articles: