Immigration Policies Force U.S. and Canada Employers to Boost Recruiting Efforts.
Survey of human resource professionals cites challenges and solutions
ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Roughly two-thirds of human resource professionals in the U.S. (66 percent) and Canada (65 percent) say tougher national immigration policies have caused their companies to increase efforts to recruit and retain local talent.
A report released today by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the Canadian Council of Human Resources Associations (CCHRA), "2008 Global Talent Sourcing in the U.S. and Canada," also examines how and why foreign workers are recruited.
"Human resource professionals value the local labor pool but know that sometimes the most highly qualified talent is found in the foreign workforce," said Susan Meisinger, president and chief executive officer of SHRM.
Of the HR professionals polled, 25 percent in the U.S. and 35 percent in Canada said the primary reason they recruit foreign nationals is an inability to successfully attract local workers with the necessary skills. That difficulty in hiring qualified local people is particularly acute in fields requiring highly scientific or technical skills, such as in health care.
Canadian firms (37 percent) are more likely than U.S. firms (17 percent) to hire foreign national workers to fill vacant positions during the next 12 months. When asked if their organizations "most likely will not hire" foreign workers within the next 12 months, U.S. HR professionals (47 percent) agreed nearly two to one over their counterparts in Canada (25 percent).
"A tightening labor market is forcing organizations to increasingly rely on immigration as a source for new talent. Governments and corporations alike must ready themselves to take on this challenge," said Lynn Palmer, CCHRA CEO.
The HR professionals reported seven key actions taken by their companies as a result of tightened immigration policies:
* Increased efforts to recruit and retain citizen and legal-resident workers: U.S. (66 percent), Canada (65 percent).
* Recruited foreign students pursuing education in the employer country: U.S. (19 percent), Canada (24 percent).
* Decided against outsourcing internationally: U.S. (18 percent), Canada (14 percent).
* Hired foreign nationals under different types of visas due to unavailability of preferred visa types and/or delays in document processing: U.S. (16 percent), Canada (22 percent).
