We all know or have heard about couples who met at work, fell in love, and lived happily ever after. Given the number of hours we spend at our jobs, it's not surprising that many love matches
In a 2006 survey published by the Society for Human Resource Management and CareerJournal.com, 80% of human resources professionals and 60% of employees polled said that there should not be a romance between a supervisor and subordinate. (Interestingly, that 80% for HR professionals represented an increase from the prior year's results while the 60% for employees represented a 10% decrease.) And only 26% of employees polled believe that romance at work should not be between people with a significant rank difference. Combine these numbers with the fact that 40% of employees polled reported that they had a romance at work and it's clear that workplace romances remain a potential source of problems for employers.
What are some of the workplace issues that can arise when supervisors and subordinates get romantically involved? It's not a tough list to piece together and here are just a few, in no particular order:
In particular, the issue of favoritism became a very real concern for employers when, in 2005, the California Supreme Court decided the case of Miller v. Department of Corrections. Miller involved a prison warden who had consensual affairs with three of the female corrections officers. According to the plaintiff (another female corrections officer), the three paramours received preferential treatment regarding promotions and transfers. Knowledge of the affairs was relatively well known and there was a general perception in the work unit that the women were treated more favorably. And the evidence showed that the warden's favoritism toward the women who had relationships with him was at the expense of others who were prevented from being promoted or transferred to other assignments.
One incident of favoritism generally would not be enough to create a hostile work environment, but the Miller court ruled that a hostile work environment could result from a "widespread" atmosphere of sexual favoritism. While the fact pattern in the Miller case may not be common, favoritism resulting in unlawful sexual harassment remains an issue for employers.
The potential for harassment claims is even broader than claims based on favoritism. What about other employees who are forced to witness ongoing public displays of affection by the supervisor and the subordinate? Is that appropriate at work? That sort of conduct, even though it may not purposely be directed at those people who find it offensive, can definitely result in litigation. And what if the relationship ends and one partner does not take it as well as the other? This situation is ripe for harassment claims if the conduct that was previously welcomed by one partner is now considered by him/her to be unwelcome.
Other issues can come up even in cases where an organization is alert to the relationship. For example, often an employer will resolve the potential for conflicts of interest by transferring one of the employees in the relationship to a different group so that the couple is not in the same reporting hierarchy. But, depending on which partner you transfer, their role before the transfer, and their sex, you can be exposed to additional claims of sex discrimination. And if you tend most often to transfer the subordinate, you can undermine employer credibility and decrease overall employee morale.
With all this being said, what's an employer to do? Can you eliminate risks associated with romances at work? No, not completely. But if you work with your human resources department and legal counsel before problems arise, there are several "best practices" you can put in place for risk management:
Workplace romances are a reality. If you partner with your human resources organization and legal counsel now to put some protective measures in place, you will be ahead of the game if and when issues arise. Love may be in the air but it doesn't have to poison the workplace. Be proactive. Set conduct expectations. Enforce your policies. Train your workforce about appropriate and inappropriate conduct. Taking action now will help you continue to maintain a professional environment for all your employees going forward.
Note: This article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you have a legal issue or wish to obtain legal advice, you should consult an attorney in your area concerning your particular situation and facts. Nothing presented on this site or in this article establishes or should be construed as establishing an attorney-client or confidential relationship between you and Barrie Gross. This article is provided only as general information, which may or may not reflect the most current legal developments or be complete.