INTRODUCTION
In Should We Trust in Trust? Professor Koehn has succeeded in her goal: "to open up some areas for further research by persons in a variety of disciplines."(1) She challenges us to realize that only by reflecting more deeply upon
trust can we make a determination of whether we ought to place our faith in trust.In keeping with this special issue's purpose of fostering dialogue between legal scholars and philosophers, I would like to raise comments from the perspectives of legal practice, legal philosophy, and legal doctrine. I begin by relating three vignettes involving trust from my practice of law. Turning to legal philosophy, I raise a cautionary note regarding the ambiguity of "shared values" in the concept of trust. I then demonstrate some ways in which legal doctrines can assist us in fostering trust.
TRUST AND LEGAL PRACTICE
In legal practice the risks and opportunities of trust are readily apparent. To illustrate this, permit me to relate three short vignettes.(2)
Case One: An elderly woman, a thirty-five-year client of my
three-person law office, called just a few weeks into my career. Her sister
had been seriously injured in a car accident and was on life-support
systems. In the absence of the senior partner (my father), she asked
me if she should remove the life-support systems. She assured me
she would do whatever I recommended.
Case Two: In my ethics classes, no person is viewed as more
untrustworthy than a car dealer. But "Earl," a car dealer in my
hometown of 800 residents, was one of the most trusted persons in
the community. Earl did not negotiate price. You told Earl what
you wanted and he told you the price for which he could sell it.
End of negotiation. Earl had every reason to be trustworthy. That
is the kind of person he wanted to be. More cynically, if he did
start cheating people, the news would be the talk of the local greasy
spoon located one hundred yards away and his reputation would be
lost. No doubt there was a connection between these two motivations,
but the point is that Earl would not be dishonest and therefore
people reposed tremendous trust in him.