Although this book is presented as a self-contained volume, it is in
fact a collection of essays written by the author (and some with a co-author)
since the late 1980s. Most have previously been published in English and/or
German. There are two exceptions for any language
English. As the title suggests, these are ruminations on the experience with the
transitions in Eastern Europe, in this case by a German political scientist.
But the accent is without a doubt on the transformation of the former
German Democratic Republic (GDR) and its consequences for German
unification.
The volume contains nine chapters ranging over a wide range of
issues. Offe starts off with a discussion of the shared features and
shortcomings of both state-socialist and democratic-capitalist societies. His
method is reminiscent of dialectics, with all of its drawbacks, but also the
wide range
of outlets it affords, at times maddeningly so. Then he discusses the GDR
experience. He contends that the country's raison d'etre as a nation was
tenuous, confined almost completely to economics and the wall, and hence bound
to fail on both counts since the only force behind the GDR's transition was
the aspiration of people toward economic prosperity. From this he argues
that the principal force underneath the unification fire is nationalism as a
way of papering over the increasingly shrill discourse on income
redistribution. He is rather pessimistic about this being quality cement to hold
together a new, well-functioning German state. He clearly would have preferred
a new constitution rather than the minimal modification of the "Basic Law"
that was in fact enacted.
In the following chapter he ponders whether a capitalist economy can
be brought about by democratic means and the troubles with democratic
theory, given the three overwhelming challenges in the eastern
countries -- the territorial issues of physical and psychological borders,
replacing the
monoparty system with pluralistic democracy, and setting up an economic
and property order together with the orderly political management of
pressing production and distributional problems.
Chapter 4 is devoted to ethnic politics in the transitions considered in
general, though one must strain his paradigms to make them applicable to
most transition economies (TEs) other than some of the successor States of
the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Yet he maintains that the "`ethnification' of
the politics of transition is the outcome of powerful ... causal forces that
manifest themselves through rational strategic individuals operative in
post-Communist societies ... and that it is exceedingly difficult to design
universalist institutional or constitutional arrangements that would pave the
way for the peaceful of coexistence of ethnic groups within" the TEs. This
sounds ambitious but apparently means little more than that countries with
substantial minorities try to galvanize around the wishes of the majority,
however canvassed, and find it all but impossible to integrate the minorities,
even if they wanted to. Why this should be so different in the TEs, Offe
attributes to the peculiar kind of nationalism there as distinct from the way
"nations" were forged earlier in western Europe. He views ethnic nationalism
as making conflict resolution all but impossible except through the "logic of
rational political nihilism," that is, by creating a fait accompli and letting
force decide. Is this pessimism really warranted for most TEs?
Chapter 5 is devoted to the dilemmas of righting actual or perceived
wrongs under state socialism through disqualification, retribution, and
restitution, though the latter is the topic of the following chapter. Offe makes
a strong case as regards the insuperable obstacles in trying to identify who was
wronged under the old regime and more in attempting to design ways and
means of righting the wrongs, even if expediency rather than philosophy and
morals were the guiding forces. His motive is that "being a `victim' is not a
self-evident and easily recognized fact, but a thoroughly political construct".
He elaborates (together with Frank Bonker) on this theme in
Chapter 6 with reference to the morality of restitution, although he uses the
term in a somewhat odd manner (p. 108). Not surprisingly, he finds few
justifications for restitution other than political expediency, and it is the
latter that
determines the array of knotty questions encountered on the slippery path of
restitution in view of "all kinds of arbitrary interests, privileges and
resentments", rather than high morals, that steer the process.
In the following two chapters the author returns to the GDR theme,
first to identify the special path of transformation in the GDR and then to
contrast the "economic hardware" with "institutional software" in the
post-war and post-1989 transitions to democracy in the FRG and GDR,
respectively. The monistic economic justification for the GDR resurfaces here
with even greater force. But Offe is now prepared to consider the "imperial" way
in which FRG politicians and the civil service, trade unions, and
industrialists lorded it over the, admittedly feeble, GDR reform leadership,
thus almost certainly squashing whatever incipient means for a more modulated
unification process could have been mustered (but that is denied in Chapter
2!). Next Offe examines the paradox of the postwar "miraculous" recovery
of the FRG in spite of considerable odds and of the "failed post-GDR miracle"
in spite of all the advantages enjoyed. He attributes this to the fact that
institutions (in the broad sense) were imposed upon the GDR without the latter's
leadership having had any say in them; and these were hardly suited to the
conditions in the country.
Finally, Offe considers what remains for the "left" after the "west's
victory" by pursuing the importance of socialism, and even of state
socialism, for the modification of capitalism and the virtual disappearance of
true leftism in most western societies. He predicts that raw capitalism in the
TEs will in due course necessitate again "modifications," just like those in
western countries since the late 19th century. Even so, he argues that the
western welfare state is being eroded rapidly precisely because the
state-socialist
challenge has vanished. No doubt it has. But the slowdown in economic growth
and substantial demographic shifts toward the elderly do not even enter Offe's
equation.
Perhaps an economist should not comment on the substance of what
is essentially a collection of philosophical, sociological, and
political-science precepts and insights. But in following TE developments, one
can confine oneself to strict economic affairs only at one's own peril. That
said, I found this collection of essays by Offe both highly stimulating and very
disturbing. There are all too many reasons for this impression as I wended my
way through the several essays. I can cite only some. Clearly, Offe is much
more familiar with German realities than with those of the "true" TEs. It
would have been interesting had he confined his commentary chiefly to
German or GDR matters. Also, some essays attempt to present a general theory,
such as on nationalism and ethnicity, while discussing transition phenomena.
None is fully developed, and at least this reader got lost several times
between the theoretical generality and its applicability to TEs. That gets
aggravated only by the loose mode of discourse that the author favors. like in
some of his dialectical wanderings, he likes to set up straw men only to shoot
them down several pages down the essay, and then chiefly in a conditional
mode. Some of the statements are flatly contradictory (e.g., on the strategic
role of TEs on pp. 168 and 202). Where he stands on many of the issues is
seemingly clear at one point only to be cast in doubt a bit down the essay or
in another one. Although the author freely comments, often disparagingly,
about economic affairs, his analyses could benefit from some brushing up.
Surely there must be more at issue in transformation than "price reform ...
and property reform (privatization)"; and price and property reform
certainly do not suffice to establish "a complete capitalist system of
control". I found it particularly irritating to see him confound
"privatization" with "property" and to treat the latter as an economic
category!
Apart from the appearance of the book, rather than it having been
squarely presented as a collection of essays, I signal several shortcomings in
presentation and typography. There is repetition and overlap among the
essays. This would have been unavoidable if the book had indeed been
presented as a simple reprint of essays, which this one is not. Now it is simply
irritating to read virtually verbatim the same statements (compare pp.
112-13 with pp. 118-19 in the same essay! or elsewhere in collection). Though
he makes an admirable attempt to preserve diacriticals, the effort is
lackadaisical at best, and in some cases rather embarrassing (such as the
Romanian's). Facts and figures are confounded (e.g., Tienanmen Square is placed
in July 1989 p. 20 but correctly on 4 June 1989 on p. 135; the 1989 events in
Yugoslavia p. 65 presumably refer to the 1988 abolition of the autonomous
regions and Milosev's assent to supervising the implementation of Greater
Serbian ambitions), and it is disappointing that the editor did not catch at
least the contradictory statements. There is some heavily Germanic English
at some points ("brother countries" is more readily translated as "fraternal
countries"); CMEA on p. 12 is mistranslated. Some Russian words are
transliterated German style, but with the accents on the sc for shch missing!.
Jadwiga Staniszkis is referred to, albeit consistently, as Staniskis!
In short, although I have reservations about the book, some of the
ideas worked out, especially with respect to the GDR and German affairs
more generally, on which Offe speaks with authority, deserve to be wider
known. Selective background reading is recommended.