Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com
 

Use the Rifle Approach to Safety

Sunday, January 20 2008

Reducing injuries and accidents in any organization is a big task and requires a focused approach. For the best results, take the rifle approach to safety, not the shotgun approach. Through a concentrated analysis of your data, even with limited financial resources, you can determine how to best reduce your injuries.

First, analyze the data. Ask these types of questions.

  • What types of losses are we experiencing?
  • Which are most frequent?
  • Which injuries cost the most?
  • Where do these losses occur?
  • How can we reduce these losses?
  • Which losses should we focus on?

For example, you may have quite a few eye injuries, but you find they cost an average of $400 per injury. Your second or third most frequent loss may cost significantly more per claim, such as low-back injuries, which can average $7,500 or more per claim. In this case, it’s clear that targeting back injuries should be where you should begin.

Examine the location of losses. Perhaps falls occur most frequently in your parking lot during icy winter conditions. If so, you know that loss control efforts must be increased during times of inclement weather. If driving losses are hurting your bottom line, then implement more driver training or stricter driver policies.

In an organization where safety has not yet become a corporate value, the battle to reduce losses may be long-fought. Since money always talks to the financial personnel in top management, the best way to move your organization toward more cohesive safety efforts is to show them, in dollars, what losses are costing the organization.

Without strong management support, you must start small. In some cases, resistance may be so entrenched that it’s best to find one or two departments who will cooperate with safety efforts and start there. But proceed cautiously, because with most people, perception is reality. If your audience perceives a risk management policy or effort as unreasonable, it sets your risk management program back a big step when employees or other managers take up the chant to disparage your efforts. If you deliver a message in a way that managers and employees perceive as demeaning, employees will stop listening. Then when there's a critically important issue, they have already tuned you out.

A large scientific research agency recently sponsored a safety campaign encouraging the use of handrails when climbing stairs. Employees stood at the top of the stairs and handed out candy bars to employees who used the banister as they traversed the stairwells. While this may be a great idea in some circumstances, it is probably not such a hot idea when you’re dealing with scientists such as those in this agency, with IQs roughly equivalent to their body weight.

Similar to the duct tape advice after the anthrax scare in 2003, few people felt safer or were more likely to listen to the Department of Homeland Security’s advice after that official recommendation. Words have power and it’s sometimes better to be silent than to pick the wrong words or the wrong issue and send a message that backfires.

Usually, the majority of supervisors and managers are willing to work more safely, so until there is more organizational buy-in to risk management, focus efforts on those who want to work with you. Most of the others will come along eventually. The numbers in the departments where safety is stressed will also, after a year or so, speak for themselves, and senior managers will take note.

If you as a manager are enthused about safety, you may assume that others are, as well. Generally, they aren’t. Campaigns like the great candy-bar giveaway may win a temporary battle because we feel we did something, but we lose the war because employees tune out the safety message. When setting our sites on safety, we have to aim carefully.

In addition, make sure to read these articles:

  • Shops and the environment.
  • With numerous maintenance facilities in a variety of locations, two of the nation's leading full-service truck leasing companies have developed expertise at ensuring compliance with ......
  • Shopping center branding: Does it make sense?
  • INTRODUCTION A rancher was asked the name of his ranch. He replied, "It's the ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ Ranch." He was then asked how many head of cattle ......
  • An American Love Story.com...Part II
  • Last issue, we discussed some of the problems and negative attitudes some retailers have about the Internet. Now letís approach opportunities. The Internetís opportunities are ......
  • La-Z-Boy Canada safety program decreasing injuries
  • Waterloo, Ontario— La-Z-Boy Canada credits its health, wellness and safety initiatives for an 81% decrease in lost-time injuries to employees from 1999 to 2002. Don ......
  • Identify safety conscious employees.
  • Identify safety-conscious employees Do you believe that accidents are a matter of bad luck or fate? Or do you think that individuals can take steps ......
  • How to attract investors
  • All Investment Promotion Agencies around the world are busy looking for investment, especially FDI. But who are the investors, what are they looking for and ......
  • Standard Register hits world record on plantsafety.
  • DAYTON, Ohio--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 12, 1997-- CEO To Serve Employees at Steak Dinner Celebration Standard Register's Dayton plant has achieved a world record in the graphic ......
  • Resident beds. (Product Focus: Safety).
  • Sunrise Medical offers quality beds that provide optimum safety for both caregivers and residents. The Joerns [R] UltraCare [TM] family provides increased staff safety and ......
  • Safety Organization Urges NASCAR to Rev Up...
  • Business Editors, Sports Writers DES PLAINES, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 12, 2001 As the Daytona 500 kicks off another NASCAR racing season at Daytona International Speedway on ......
  • Minimizing back injuries in nursing home staff.
  • Dockworkers have nothing on nursing home personnel when it comes to sheer physical labor. And minimizing job-related injury is just as important in the nursing ......
  • Creating a culture of safety.
  • Building safety consciousness and accident prevention measures into the corporate culture has helped ServiceMaster Co. to significantly reduce on-the-job injuries and workers' comp costs. It's ......
  • Minimizing back injuries in nursing home staff.
  • In the event of a "Hurricane Andrew" type emergency, could your facility's staff quickly and safely transfer non-ambulatory residents without causing injury to them and ......
  • Nursing home safety: updating the new...
  • Safety precautions and plans for emergencies are among the everyday responsibilities of the nursing home administrator. Any facility is subject to the risk of serious ......
  • Smithfield sees reinforcement for food safety...
  • Among the work being done by major manufacturers of deli products to stop Listeria in its tracks, Smithfield Packing Co. is employing a number of ......
  • Addressing Back Injuries
  • HEADNOTE departments Occupational back injuries make up nearly a third of all workers' compensation claims payments, annually accounting for nearly 12 million lost work days ......

Latest Comments in  posts

This post is so factual and realistic it should be required reading for any business large or small. Thanks for contributing the information. I believe that every business should place a high priority on safety. In my opinion, the economical advantages certainly outweigh the cost of dealing with any injury itself. Bottom line is, just like this post suggest, it is better to be safe that sorry. As a business owner, you should fortify your business on every aspect.
By: Sindhney on 1/21/08 at 11:16 AM
The article betrays the risk management criteria that infuriates me as a safety professional. Nancy chooses which workplace hazard to focus on by the dollar cost of the injury. On this criteria a back injury is more important than an eye injury. I suggest that she tries explaining that to the person who has a facial disfigurement or visual impairment. Cost is important but it should not be the first criteria assessed in reducing harm in the workplace ...
By: Kevin Jones on 2/19/08 at 11:19 PM
Thanks for your input, Kevin. It's true, injuries that don't cost much should still be focused on. However, when you're trying to triage many injuries, where do you begin to target your efforts? Most safety professionals will say start with frequency then focus on severity. In 600 words, it's never possible for me to say all I need to say about a subject. As I noted, cost is only one of the factors listed.
By: Nancy Germond on 2/20/08 at 8:33 PM
You must sign-in or sign-up to comment on this post.
presented by
Franchising Expert
mleonard_80
Ask Mark Leonard, Our
Franchising Expert,
Your Question
Small Business Expert
rlesonsky_80
Ask Rieva Lesonsky, Our
Small Business Expert,
Your Question
B2B Sales Expert
jkonrath_80
Ask Jill Konrath, Our
B2B Sales Expert,
Your Question
Business Travel Expert
krosen_80
Ask Ken Walker, Our
Business Travel Expert,
Your Question
Finance Expert
sthacker_80
Ask Sam Thacker, Our
Finance Expert,
Your Question
Invention Expert
Ask Stephen Key, Our
Expert on Licensing Your
Invention, a Question