Small Business Resources, Business Advice and Forms from AllBusiness.com

Professor Victor Brudney's article entitled "Revisiting the Import of Shareholder Consent for Corporate Fiduciary Loyalty Obligations," published in Volume 25, Number 2 contained an error. Footnote sixty-- five was inadvertently duplicated and restated in footnote sixty-six. Footnote sixty-six should

read as follows:

66. That the bulk of the statutes address explicitly only the voidability of the transactions leaves ambiguous their import for the monetary accountability of the so-called disinterested parties who approve the transaction. The invocation of the fairness test in the case of self dealing by controllers implicates liability for the actors. See supra note 12. RMBCA 8.61(b) (1998) and those states following it also expressly address the liability of the actors in such transactions. See, e.g., ALA. CODE 10-213-8.61 (1999); ARIZ. REV. STAT. 10861 (1999); VT. STAT. ANN. 8.61 (1999).

The Journal apologizes for this mistake.

In addition, make sure to read these articles:

Medical Practices: Why a Good Accountant and Bookkeeper Are Important
Interview with Peter Lucash, AllBusiness.com's Medical Practice Advisor