During the '90s, Raleigh-based Clancy & Theys Construction could focus on commercial jobs, avoiding the hassles and delays of public projects. Its home market, the Triangle, was booming. But as the economy slipped into recession, demand fell for commercial offices and other private buildings.
Now, like many of the state's contractors, Clancy & Theys is bidding for more public work. "We have 30 superintendents on staff in our Raleigh office. We need two dozen jobs running. We need to land six a quarter." These days, the only way to ensure that the pipeline stays full is to vie for public projects.
"There is just a lot of apprehension and concern about the market right now," says Dave Simpson, North Carolina building director for the Carolinas Associated General Contractors. "Things appeared to be trailing off before Sept. 11. That added to the woes. Contractors are getting jittery."
A sedative for builders has come in the form of a trove of public construction money that began to hit the market in 2001 - $3.1 billion for the state's university system and $1.2 billion for elementary and secondary schools. "We're doing a lot of bids for the bond money," Cutler says.
Commie Johnson, president of Greensboro-based R.L. Casey, which specializes in public jobs, is feeling the new competition: "Where you used to have five contractors bidding on a project, now you have 12 to 15." Indeed, public work has become the lifeblood of many. Backlogs of projects that built up during the '90s boom are starting to dwindle. And banks are hesitant to back new projects.
Of course, not all commercial construction has dried up. Mike Cooke, president of Weaver Cooke Construction in Greensboro, says his company continues to do well in niches such as retirement homes and historical renovations. Weaver started work this year on Asheville's $17 million Grove Arcade, a downtown renovation, and is beginning a $24 million retirement center in Concord called Taylor Glen.
More private projects were supposed to have been sparked by 11 interest-rate cuts in 2001 by the Federal Reserve. The Fed has kept cutting rates to induce businesses to borrow and invest. Trouble is, other regulators are sending the opposite message to lenders. As is typical in a recession, they have been cautioning banks to pay attention to declining credit quality, particularly on commercial real-estate loans.
One area where lower rates have helped is the sales of new and existing homes. Mortgage rates -- at 30-year lows -- fueled a burst in the housing market, and that could give the rest of the state's economy a boost in 2002. "If you've got a job and you want a house, this is a great time to buy one," says James F. Smith, an economist at UNC Chapel Hill's Kenan-Flagler Business School.
In the Triad, 9,231 homes were sold during the first three quarters of 2001, up 8% from 2000. Home sales in Charlotte grew 3%. And the Triangle fell in the middle, with a 6% increase. Some prices are up, too. In the Triangle, the median price of a new single-family home increased 8% between 1999 and 2001. The Triad's median increased 2%. Charlotte's was flat.
Outside the big metro areas, home sales remain weak. In Wilmington, they were off 9% in the first three quarters of 2001, compared with the same period in 1999. Bernard Helm, president of Market Opportunity Research Enterprises in Rocky Mount, blames the sluggish stock market: "Executives can still afford their homes, but they aren't buying beach condos." One positive for Wilmington is that the median sales price of new and existing homes has edged up after leveling off last year. It was $144,000 through the first three quarters of 2001, compared with $135,000 during the same period a year earlier.
The year also was a painful one for the manufactured-housing industry. North Carolina is the second-largest producer in the nation, but shipments of Tar Heel mobile homes were down 36% during the first three quarters, compared with a year ago. The state's biggest mobile-home builder, Greensboro-based Oakwood Homes, followed that trend. It has responded by restructuring, closing 90 retail centers and, in July, appointing Myles Standish as its new president and CEO.
For the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, Oakwood sales fell from $1.2 billion to $1 billion. But its net loss was down to $120.9 million, compared with $176.1 million the previous year.
[Graph omitted]
N.C. EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES
EMPLOYMENT
1996 1998 2000
General contractors 50,571 54,684 58,195
Heavy construction 27,594 31,844 33,282
Trade contractors 110,881 128,532 140,437
TOTAL 189,046 215,060 231,914
REAL-ESTATE EMPLOYMENT
1996 1998 2000
Agents and managers (*) 17,795 20,407 21,504
Operators and lessors 8,162 8,119 8,256
Developers and subdividers 3,928 4,084 4,045
TOTAL 29,885 32,610 33,805
CONSTRUCTION WAGES (**)
1996 1998 2000
General contractors $526.28 $594.48 $650.72
Heavy construction 520.06 579.25 613.88
Trade contractors 455.38 513.34 555.86
ALL GROUPS 483.79 543.73 587.99
REAL-ESTATE WAGES (**)
1996 1998 2000
Agents and managers (*) $480.90 $530.48 $568.43
Operators and lessors 402.54 489.56 546.24
Developers and subdividers 503.86 559.36 735.45
ALL GROUPS 462.52 523.91 583.00
(*)Includes title Insurance worker
(**)average weekly wage
Source: Employment Security Commission
MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
(excludes industrial facilities, highways, prisons and schools)
COMMERCIAL PROJECT/ COST
LOCATION (in millions)
Intermodal airport hub $325
Charlotte
Streets at Southpoint shopping
mall 220
Durham
Hearst Tower 170
Charlotte
Westin Hotel 148
Charlotte
Gateway Village 130
Charlotte
Raleigh-Durham airport parking
deck 103
Morrisville
TIAA-CREF headquarters 100
Charlotte
SouthPark mall expansion 100
Charlotte
Barracks at Fort Bragg 66
Fayetteville
RamsHead Project at UNC 44
Chapel Hill
Sources: Carolinas Associated General Contractors, published reports,
contractors; projects under construction in 2001
TOP COUNTIES/COMMERCIAL
(dollars in millions)
NEW ADDITIONS/ TOTAL
PROJECTS COST ALTERATIONS COST COST
Mecklenburg 1,787 $596.7 2,105 $370.9 $967.6
Durham 226 74.8 455 121.6 196.4
New Hanover 416 135.1 689 39.4 174.5
Wake 342 91.3 390 42.3 133.6
Catawba 410 60.3 125 52.8 113.l
Guilford 244 55.7 281 33.1 88.8
Forsyth 644 39.3 174 23.4 62.7
Iredell 439 41.3 114 14.6 55.9
Pitt 393 40.1 185 15.5 55.6
Buncombe 217 25.6 174 11.8 37.4
Source: N. C. Labor Department, 2000
TOP COUNTIES/RESIDENTIAL
(dollars in millions)
SINGLE-FAMILY MULTIFAMILY
PROJECTS COST PROJECTS COST TOTAL
Mecklenburg 7,560 $1,091.6 2,143 $206.7 $1,298.3
Wake 6,300 956.6 1,365 131.3 1,087.9
Union 2,083 261.4 64 4.1 265.5
Guilford 1,980 250.9 287 25.6 276.5
Durham 1,369 226.8 101 12.3 239.1
Forsyth 1,565 203.2 321 23.7 226.9
Iredell 1,221 195.7 45 3.8 199.5
New Hanover 1,226 141.5 33 4.1 145.6
Cabarrus 1,292 131.6 109 7.8 139.4
Johnston 1,060 115.4 71 4.7 120.1
Source: Market Opportunity Research Enterprises, 2001